Survival outcomes of a population-based cohort of adolescent and young adult (AYA), acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) patients in Ontario, Canada: The IMPACT Cohort
Bibliographic record
Abstract
IntroductionAdolescents and young adults (AYA) are an understudied population in cancer research. The Initiative to Maximize Progress in Adolescent and Young Adult Cancer Therapy (IMPACT) cohort includes Ontario individuals aged 15-21 years, diagnosed with a malignancy during 1992-2011. This cohort contains a rich source of patient, disease, and treatment data.
 Objectives and ApproachThe IMPACT cohort was created using chart review and linkages to population-based health services databases. The cohort is comprised of AYA with a primary diagnosis of acute leukemia, Hodgkin lymphoma, non-Hodgkin lymphoma, sarcoma, or testicular cancer. For the current study, we focused on acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) patients, and examined survival outcomes of those treated at pediatric vs adult centers, with adult vs pediatric protocols. We assessed 5-year event-free survival (first of relapse, progression, secondary malignant neoplasm, or death) and overall survival.
 ResultsThe IMPACT cohort contains 2,963 patients, of which 152/271 ALL patients were treated at adult centers. The 5-year event-free survival (EFS ± standard error) among those treated at a pediatric vs. adult center was 72%±4% vs. 56%±4% (p = 0.03), respectively. The 5-year overall survival (OS) was 82%±4% vs. 64%±4% (p
 Conclusion/ImplicationsALL patients treated with a pediatric protocol at a pediatric center experienced better, crude survival outcomes compared to those at an adult center. The IMPACT cohort offers the opportunity to study a myriad of questions on different cancer groups, with the ultimate goal of improving outcomes among the AYA population.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".