MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2889843557 · doi:10.1109/comapp.2018.8460222

Integrating Small Scale Green Energy into Smart Grids: Prediction for Peak Load Reduction

2018· article· en· W2889843557 on OpenAlexaff
Sonam Rinchen, Abdulsalam Yassine, Kevin Schwartzentruber, Hamsa Ahmed, Andy Armitage

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSmart Grid Energy Management
Canadian institutionsLakehead University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSmart gridPhotovoltaic systemScheduleGridAutoregressive integrated moving averageComputer scienceEnergy consumptionAutoregressive modelSimulationReduction (mathematics)Automotive engineeringReal-time computingEnvironmental scienceTime seriesElectrical engineeringEngineeringMathematicsStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The emerging Smart Grid technologies allow for the integration of clean energy from small-scale energy generators (SEGs). In this paper, we investigate a model by which an electric grid operator (EGOs) schedules the integration of clean energy from residential homes acting as SEGs. These SEGs are equipped with rooftop photovoltaic (PV) and a bank of utility grade battery systems. The challenge facing the electric grid operator (EGO) is that home-based battery systems require several hours of sunlight to charge from rooftop PV panels, and an average 90 minutes to be discharged to 30% original capacity. The EGO must be able to schedule the discharging cycle so that it coincides with the time of the highest peak load during the day for efficient cost reduction. In this paper, we propose a model that allows the EGO to predict the highest peak of energy consumption on the distribution feed where the SEGs are connected. For the realization of the system, we have acquired a dataset which includes time series of energy consumption data for approximately 1500 houses including 3 SEGs. We performed our prediction using the multivariate autoregressive integrated moving average (MARIMA) method and achieved 92.64% accuracy. The real-life implementation of the system and the prediction model are described in this paper.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.859
Threshold uncertainty score0.729

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.195
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSmart Grid Energy ManagementFrench-language works237,207