Kinetostatic Analysis of a Simple Cable-Driven Parallel Crane
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper introduces the concept of a new planar Cable-Driven Parallel Crane (CDPC) for lifting and carrying payloads with a moving hoist mechanism connected in parallel to the ceiling. In contrast to bridge-crane, CDPC is inexpensive and practicable for diverse tasks with simple assembly setup. The hoist mechanism is an under-constrained moving-platform articulated through a bi-actuated cable circuit, namely, a cable loop. The hoist is connected to a suspended moving-platform with four degrees of freedom. The power is transmitted directly from the motors fixed on frames to the hoist through the cable loop. Therefore, the dynamic performance of the robot is increased due to lower inertia of the moving-platform. However, the moving-platform undergoes some parasitic inclinations because of the cable loop. This paper investigates the parasitic inclination and its effect on the positioning of the payload. The workspace of the CDPC is studied in terms of static equilibrium. Moreover, the geometrico-static and elasto-static models of the CDPC are presented.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".