Randomized controlled trial to test the efficacy of trans-tympanic injections of a sodium thiosulfate gel to prevent cisplatin-induced ototoxicity.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
e17560 Background: The hearing loss due to cisplatin cochlear damage is frequent and severe. Antioxidants, such as sodium thiosulfate (STS), can neutralize the effects of cisplatin, but, when administered systemically, they decrease its efficacy. In animal experiments, STS deposited in the middle ear reached the cochlea and reduced cisplatin ototoxicity. We conducted a randomized controlled trial to test the efficacy of trans-tympanic injections of a STS gel to prevent cisplatin-induced ototoxicity. Methods: Eligible participants were patients with symmetrical hearing treated for a locally advanced head and neck cancer with chemoradiation including 3 cisplatin cycles (100 mg/m 2 ). For each participant, one randomly selected ear received the injections while the other ear did not. On the eve of each cisplatin treatment, a trans-tympanic injection deposited 0.1 ml of an immediately prepared STS-hyaluronate gel (0.5 M) on the round window. The main outcome was assessed blindly using the shift of hearing threshold in decibels (dB) from before chemoradiation to one month thereafter for pure-tone air conduction at 0.5-14 kHz frequencies. Adverse effects were noted according to CTCAE. Assuming a lower hearing loss of 7.0 dB for the treated ears, 0.90 power and 0.05 two-sided statistical significance, 25 patients were needed. The main outcome was assessed in a mixed linear model with hearing threshold shift as dependent variable and intervention, frequency and radiation dose to the cochlea as independent variables. Results: From January to December 2015, 13 patients were randomized. The trial was stopped in June 2016 for poor accrual. The average loss of hearing over all frequencies was 1.5 dB less for the treated ears than for the control ears. The difference was not statistically (p = 0.56) nor clinically significant, but was consistently in favor of the treated ears for all frequencies between 3 and 10 kHz. The intervention adverse effects were mild. Conclusions: Our trial suggests that STS deposited in the middle ear reached the cochlea but was not clinically effective. More work is needed to improve the efficacy of trans-tympanic administration of cisplatin antidotes. Clinical trial information: NTC02281006.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.047 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".