Impact of dyskinesia on activities of daily living in Parkinson's disease: Results from pooled phase 3 ADS-5102 clinical trials
Bibliographic record
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: In Parkinson's disease, dyskinesias result from disease progression and chronic levodopa therapy. Using Unified Dyskinesia Rating Scale (UDysRS) data pooled from two pivotal trials of ADS-5102 (amantadine) extended-release capsules in dyskinetic patients, we assessed the impact of dyskinesia on activities of daily living (ADLs), and the effects of ADS-5102 versus placebo. METHODS: Patients had troublesome dyskinesia (≥1 h/day) and at least mild functional impact of dyskinesia per Movement Disorder Society Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale, Part IV, item 4.2. UDysRS Parts 1B, 3, and 4 scores at baseline were summarized descriptively. Twelve-week changes in score distributions and total scores were tested for significant differences between treatments. RESULTS: Among 196 patients, the majority (63%-73%) characterized their dyskinesia at baseline as having at least a mild impact on walking and balance; public and social settings; exciting or emotional settings; doing hobbies and other activities; handwriting; and dressing (six of ten ADLs in UDysRS Part 1B). By clinician ratings (in Parts 3 and 4), greatest impairment was most often observed in the trunk (62% of patients) and occurred most often for the ADL of dressing (64% had at least moderate impairment). ADS-5102 significantly reduced the patient-rated impact of dyskinesia on six of ten ADLs in Part 1B, the clinician-rated intensity of dyskinesia in all seven body regions assessed in Part 3, and the clinician-rated disability during three of four ADL tasks assessed in Part 4. Improvements in Parts 1B, 3, and 4 total scores were also statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Dyskinesia can impair multiple tasks of daily living. Further studies may help characterize its underreported impact. By several measures, ADS-5102 treatment was associated with significant improvement of dyskinesias.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.010 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".