Pedagogy of Indifference: State Responses to Violence Against Indigenous Girls
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La recente decision de la Cour qui a acquitte Raymond Cormier accuse du meurtre de Tina Fontaine, une fillette de 14 ans, a provoque un tolle general et decu les autochtones qui y ont vu un exemple probant de la violence coloniale qui sevit toujours. Pour plusieurs cette decision sert a confirmer que le Canada est une societe ou la violence envers les jeunes autochtones n’est pas seulement occultee mais elle est sanctionnee. Des la naissance de Tina, le Canada a constamment doute de la competence de sa famille et de la communaute pour la proteger et la soigner, alors qu’il ne lui en donnait pas les moyens. La petite Tina etait sous la tutelle juridique, donc sous la responsabilite du Canada qui devait voir a sa securite dans les espaces prives et publics. L’etude de la Gendarmerie Royale sur « Les femmes autochtones disparues et assassinees : un apercu operationnel national » publiee il y a quelques mois avant la mort de Tina a revele que le Canada avait failli a sa tâche. Les documents rapportes et les histoires sur la violence sexuelle et sexiste envers les femmes et les jeunes filles autochtones pronaient une education publique qui soutenait la violence plutot que de la prevenir.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.011 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.017 | 0.019 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.009 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".