MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Pembrolizumab monotherapy as first-line therapy in advanced clear cell renal cell carcinoma (accRCC): Results from cohort A of KEYNOTE-427.

2018· article· en· W2890014497 on OpenAlexaff
David F. McDermott, Jae‐Lyun Lee, Cezary Szczylik, Frede Donskov, Jahangeer Malik, B. Yа. Alekseev, James Larkin, В. Б. Матвеев, Rustem Gafanov, Piotr Tomczak, Scott S. Tykodi, Poul Geertsen, Paweł Wiechno, Sang Joon Shin, Frédéric Pouliot, Teresa Alonso Gordoa, Wenting Li, Rodolfo F. Perini, Charles Schloss, Michael B. Atkins

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRenal cell carcinoma treatment
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePembrolizumabCohortClinical endpointInternal medicineRenal cell carcinomaOncologyResponse Evaluation Criteria in Solid TumorsProgressive diseaseAdverse effectSurgeryUrologyClinical trialDiseaseCancerImmunotherapy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

4500 Background: Programmed death-1 (PD-1) inhibitor–based combination therapy shows clinical benefit in first-line accRCC. However, data are limited on clinical impact of first-line PD-1 inhibitor monotherapy. KEYNOTE-427 (NCT02853344) is a single-arm, open-label, 2-cohort, phase 2 study that evaluates efficacy and safety of the PD-1 inhibitor pembrolizumab (pembro) as first-line monotherapy in accRCC and anccRCC. Results from the accRCC cohort (cohort A) are presented. Methods: Patients (pts) with histologically confirmed accRCC who received no prior systemic therapy were eligible. Additional key eligibility criteria included measurable disease (RECIST v1.1, independent central review [ICR]) and Karnofsky performance status ≥70%. Pembro 200 mg was administered intravenously Q3W for 2 y or until confirmed progressive disease, unacceptable toxicity, or pt decision to withdraw. Primary end point: objective response rate (ORR) per RECIST v1.1, ICR. Additional end points included duration of response, safety, and biomarkers associated with response. Results: At data cutoff (Oct 6, 2017), median (range) follow-up was 7.2 (0.9-11.7) mo. 110 pts were enrolled; 107 included in the efficacy analysis (opportunity for ≥1 postbaseline assessment). Median age (range) was 64 (29-87); 78% were male. 37.3%, 47.3%, and 15.5% of pts had IMDC risk categories of favorable, intermediate, and poor, respectively. Confirmed ORR by ICR was 33.6% (n = 36; 95% CI, 24.8-43.4) with 1 complete response (0.9%) and 35 (32.7%) partial responses. ORR for pts with favorable, intermediate/poor risk IMDC was 27.5% and 37.3%, respectively. Median duration of response was not reached (range, 1.4+ to 8.2+). 73.6% of pts experienced a treatment-related adverse event (AE); most common (≥10%) were fatigue (23.6%), pruritus (21.8%), diarrhea (16.4%), rash (13.6%), and arthralgia (11.8%). 18.2% experienced a grade 3-5 treatment-related AE; 1 patient had grade 5 pneumonitis. Conclusions: Pembro monotherapy demonstrated promising efficacy and acceptable tolerability in pts with accRCC. Potential tissue-based biomarkers associated with response will be presented. Clinical trial information: NCT02853344.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.078
GPT teacher head0.403
Teacher spread0.324 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations91
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical OncologySame topicRenal cell carcinoma treatmentFrench-language works237,207