MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2890021879 · doi:10.1016/j.amsu.2018.09.007

Impact of attitude and knowledge on intention to breastfeed: Can mHealth based education influence decision to breastfeed exclusively?

2018· article· en· W2890021879 on OpenAlexaff
Yossef Alnasser, Nouf Almasoud, Dhaherah Aljohni, Rawan Almisned, Basel Alsuwaine, Rawa Alohali, Ohoud Almutairi, Reem Alhezayen

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnals of Medicine and Surgery · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBreastfeeding Practices and Influences
Canadian institutionsBC Children's HospitalUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBreastfeedingmHealthMedicineNursingIntervention (counseling)SpouseFamily medicinePediatricsPsychological intervention

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Exclusive breastfeeding has been endorsed as the healthiest feeding choice for newborns. This study aims to assess impact of expecting mothers' knowledge and attitude toward intention to breastfeed exclusively. Utilizing mobile health (mHealth) as educational tool can offer a widely distributed and affordable platform to promote exclusive breastfeeding. RESEARCH AIMS AND QUESTIONS: This study aims to assess impact of expecting mothers' knowledge, attitude and beliefs on decision to breastfeed exclusively. Furthermore, it purposes mobile health (mHealth) as educational tool offering a widely distributed, affordable and accessible platform to promote exclusive breastfeeding. METHODS: The study was conducted in prenatal clinics' waiting areas to interview expecting mothers utilizing a translated version of Infant Feeding Practices Survey II (IFPS II, CDC). After completing the survey, an educational video was shown utilizing a tablet and the question was re-asked about intention toward breastfeeding exclusively. RESULTS: Most expecting mothers indicated having some awareness about breastfeeding (67%) but only 46.1% intended to initiate exclusive breastfeeding early in life prior to the intervention. Moreover, only 53.7% believed breastfeeding is the best nutritional choice. Actually, 39.5% of participants considered breastfeeding equal to formula. Most working mothers complained of lack of workplace support to breastfeed. Also, they were not comfortable breastfeeding in front of others except spouse. Additionally, most participants found nurses and media as poor information resources. Resources utilizing social media and Internet were found useful. After watching the educational video, the majority expressed positive intention to breastfeed exclusively (80.8%). Positive intentions were associated with advance maternal age, prior breastfeeding knowledge and willingness to hear experts' opinions. CONCLUSION: Saudi women have limited knowledge about exclusive breastfeeding and early initiation. They feel unprepared, unsupported, lack resources and socially challenged. An educational material utilizing mHealth can alter intentions to breastfeed exclusively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.631
Threshold uncertainty score0.799

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.087
GPT teacher head0.437
Teacher spread0.350 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations42
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnnals of Medicine and SurgerySame topicBreastfeeding Practices and InfluencesFrench-language works237,207