Targeting Cytochrome P450 (CYP) 1B1 Enzyme with Four Series of A-Ring Substituted Estrane Derivatives: Design, Synthesis, Inhibitory Activity, and Selectivity
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cytochrome P450 (CYP) 1B1 is involved in the bioactivation of procarcinogens and drug resistance. To obtain selective CYP1B1 inhibitors over CYP1A1, we synthesized four series of estrane derivatives: (1) 12 estrone (E1)- and 17β-estradiol (E2)-derivatives bearing a 3- or a 4-pyridinyl core at C2, C3, or C4, (2) eight estrane derivatives with different sulfur groups at C3, (3) 19 E1- and E2-derivatives bearing distinct aryls at C2, and (4) five D-ring derivatives. E2-derivatives were more active than oxidized E1-analogues, thus highlighting the key role of 17β-OH for interaction with CYP1B1. 2-(4-Fluorophenyl)-E2 was the best CYP1B1 inhibitor (IC 50 = 0.24 μM), with a selectivity index (SI) of 20 over CYP1A1. Furthermore, the addition of a C17α-ethynyl group as D-ring modification improved the selectivity index to 25 with only a slight loss of activity (IC 50 = 0.37 μM). Our docking results showed that these compounds fit better into the CYP1B1 binding site than that of CYP1A1.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".