Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction: The recent literature reports that diets with different amounts and composition of n-3 vs. n-6 fatty acids may affect the expression of neuro-active molecules involved in appetite control. The orexin system, including orexin A (OXA), is expressed in the brain as well as in some peripheral organs. Among such the salivary glands are accounted. Against this background, the presence and distribution of OXA in the bovine mandibular gland (MG) were investigated to test possible effects from different compositions of dietary fatty acids. Materials and Methods: Rumen fistulated cows were fed a total mixed ration based on maize silage and were infused abomasally with coconut oil or a mix composed of linseed-safflower oil combined with the conjugated linoleic acids c9,t11 and t10,c12 (LutalinTM). MG were removed from carcasses and were fixed in buffered formaldehyde prior to embedding in paraffin for routine tissue preparation procedures. The immunohistochemical reaction was visualized on 5 μm serial sections, collected on poly-L-lysine-coated glass slides, using a monoclonal anti OXA antibody and DAB as chromogen, the intensity of the immunoreactions was analyzing using the software ImageJ, IHC Profiler plugin. Results: The immunohistochemical study showed a peculiar immunoreaction for OXA in the MGs of cows. In particular, OXA immunoreaction tested positive in the cytoplasm of ductal epithelial cells and in the serous acinar cells. Conversely, immuno-positivity was not observed in any other glandular structure or in the sections utilized as negative controls. The signal intensity was higher within the coconut oil group. Conclusion: These preliminary results showed that the OXA is present in the bovine MG with a distribution that reflects what has been already described for bovine parotid gland and for major salivary glands of pigs. The expression in this trial seemed to be affected by specific fatty acid amounts and composition in the diet.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.019 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".