MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2890112340 · doi:10.18433/jpps30150

Gorlin Syndrome Presentation and the Importance of Differential Diagnosis of Skin Cancer: A Case Report

2018· article· en· W2890112340 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Ravina Sangera-Grewal, Parbeer Grewal

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Pharmacy & Pharmaceutical Sciences · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicHedgehog Signaling Pathway Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineDermatologySkin cancerBasal cell carcinomaRashDifferential diagnosisBasal cellEczematous dermatitisPsoriasisBasal Cell Nevus SyndromeKeratoacanthomaCancerPathologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In a busy community practice, clinical skin findings can often be misinterpreted. Skin cancers can sometimes mimic rashes like psoriasis, eczema or prurigo nodularis in both appearance and symptoms. Gorlin syndrome is one such genetic syndrome, characterized by the eruption of multiple and early onset basal cell carcinomas (BCCs), which can be mistaken for a rash. We describe a 68-year-old female who presented to the dermatology office with a previous history of over 30 BCCs that had been previously biopsied and/or surgically removed. However, the patient had been lost to follow up for several years and had not been seen by a skin specialist. In the interim, she had been misdiagnosed as having eczematous or psoriatic lesions by primary care providers. Patients with Gorlin syndrome are even harder to diagnose as their skin cancers often do not possess the classic features associated with a basal cell or squamous cell carcinoma. When in doubt, and especially if failing topical therapy, patients presenting with dermatological lesions should be properly referred to a specialist for further assessment and workup.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.459
Threshold uncertainty score0.692

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.058
GPT teacher head0.417
Teacher spread0.358 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Pharmacy & Pharmaceutical SciencesSame topicHedgehog Signaling Pathway StudiesFrench-language works237,207