Abstract 19315: Geometry, Reintervention, and Growth Patterns in the Reconstructed Aortic Arch With Interdigitating Technique in Patients With Hypoplastic Left Heart Syndrome and Variants
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objectives: The interdigitating technique in aortic arch reconstruction in hypoplastic left heart syndrome and variants (HLHS) is very effective to minimize the recoarctation rate. Little is known on the aortic arch’s growth characteristics and the resulting clinical impact. Methods: 139 patients with HLHS underwent staged palliation between 2007 and 2014. 72 patients who underwent Norwood arch reconstruction with the interdigitating technique were included. Dimensions of the ascending aorta (AA), transverse arch (TA), isthmus (IA) and descending aorta (DA) in pre-stage II (P1, n=50) and pre-Fontan (P2, n=21) angiograms were measured and geometry and growth characteristics of the aortic arches were analyzed. Correlations between the aortic dimensions and clinical outcomes were assessed. Results: There were significant increases in diameters in all segments between P1 and P2 (p < .0005). The z-scores in AA, TA and IA were unchanged between P1 and P2 (p = .931/.425/.121), but increased significantly in DA at P2 (p = .039). The percent increase in diameters were comparable among 4 segments (mean, 146% in IA, 144 in DA, p=.648). There were correlations in dimensions and z-scores between P1 and P2 in AA (p = .029/.013) and TA (p = .001/ < .0005), but no correlations were found in IA (p = .140/.747) and DA (p = .075/.432). The most significant tapering in the arch dimension occurred between TA and IA in both time points (P1, 67.3% vs. P2, 61.1%, p=.303). The reverse coarctation index (TA/IA ratio) at P1 (r = .381, p = .042), but not coarctation index (CoAI, IA/DA ratio) at P1 (p = .774) had a significant correlation with post-stage II ventricular function. Balloon dilatation for recoarctation was needed in 2 (2.7%) patients prior to stage II palliation. CoAI at P1 was a predictor for ventricular dysfunction at latest follow-up (p=.017). Conclusions: Aortic arch growth after interdigitating reconstruction in HLHS is substantial and relatively constant. The isthmus growth is proportional to other segments. Overall reintervention rate for recoarctation is exceptionally low. CoAI prior to stage II palliation may be associated with long-term ventricular function.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".