Bibliographic record
Abstract
The purpose was to investigate whether the response of skeletal muscle calpain (SM‐CAPN2) activity to exercise varies by intensity, energy expenditure (EE) and/or muscle type. Rats were assigned to a control group (CG) and either a lower or higher energy expenditure exercise (LEE and HEE) group, which included three intensity groups (15m/min, 25m/min and 35m/min). Soleus (SOL), plantaris (PL) and vastus lateralis (VL) muscles were assessed for CAPN2 activities. Blood CK and SM‐CAPN2 activity increased in a dose‐dependent manner in response to exercise (r=0.66). Exercise increased SM‐CAPN2 activities from control (13.07 ± 3.51 U/G wet wt), to LEE (15.36 ± 3.40 U/G wet wt) and HEE (24.65 ± 4.21 U/G wet wt) (p<0.05). The greater SM‐CAPN2 activities observed when going from LEE (70 kcal/session) to HEE (140 kcal/session) were similar across all muscles (i.e., SOL = 67.7%, PL = 57.9% and VL 62.2%). For both LEE and HEE SM‐CAPN2 activities increased with exercise intensity in an observable dose‐dependent manner. At 15m/min (50% VO 2 max ) PL CAPN2 activities for the LEE and HEE groups were 14.1 ± 4.2 and 22.5 ± 5.5 U/g wet wt, respectively (p<0.05); at 25m/min (70% VO 2 max ) CAPN2 activities were 17.6 ± 4.4 and 33.8 ± 7.2 U/g wet wt, respectively, for LEE and HEE (p<0.05). Comparable effects of intensity were observed with the VL muscles, but not so for SOL; which had mixed responses to exercise intensity with larger inter‐animal variability. The greater response of SM‐CAPN2 activity with increasing EE and at higher exercise intensities may contribute to the increased protein release and/or protein turnover with physical activity. Supported by NSERC to ANB
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".