MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2890331056

Amor em tempos de aplicativos: masculinidades heterossexuais e a negociações de afetos na nova economia do desejo

2017· article· pt· W2890331056 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Larissa Pelúcio

Bibliographic record

VenueUNESP Institutional Repository (São Paulo State University) · 2017
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSocial and Economic Solidarity
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNova (rocket)HumanitiesArtEngineering
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The dissertation aims to expand my ethnography in digital media with men seeking sexual and affective encounters outside of marriage, using specialized websites that promise secrecy and security, as well as adventure and emotion. In that survey. I focused on the Canadian website Ashley Madison. It was a research that sough to think about contemporary conjugalities, but that led to discussions on sexuality and desires, to which were added the negotiations in the field of gender relations, in a scenario market by incitement to adventure and consumption of emotions, leading me to pay attention to the constitution of contemporary masculinities in the face of the demands. To this new key of entry, it was added the enlarged use of applications for smartphones as a resource of insertion in the competitive market of the affections. Therefore, I sough to undestand how heterosexual adult men belonging to the middle and lower middle class have been negotiating sex and love with their potential partners, how they have been dealing with gender relations that cross these contacts in the present, and how, in these digital intermediations, they perform, update and tension models of masculinities. Thus, the main objective of this dissertation was to understand how these communicational resources have influenced the form in which these men, born between 1995, understand and perform their own maculinity, ruled by the logic of romantic consumption, in the sphere of affective capitalism, when they are incited to mobilize specific ways of relationg, not always coherent with those learned in analogic media. Among the findings of this work there is the confirmation of previous reseachers that showed the transposition of vocabulary borrowed from the world of precarious work and intensified consumption to the field of affection. The romantic utopia of the hereosexual pair is confronted with the incitement to... (Complete abstract electronic access below)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.032
Threshold uncertainty score0.063

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0070.007
Scholarly communication0.0060.003
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUNESP Institutional Repository (São Paulo State University)Same topicSocial and Economic SolidarityFrench-language works237,207