Complete clearance of plasma EGFR mutations as a predictor of outcome on osimertinib in the AURA trial.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
9018 Background: Osimertinib, an EGFR T790M-selective tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), provides high and durable response rates in patients (pts) with T790M positive advanced NSCLC whose disease has progressed following EGFR-TKI therapy. We investigated whether changes in the levels of plasma EGFRmutations post-osimertinib treatment are associated with clinical outcome. Methods: We studied pts from the AURA Phase I study (NCT01802632) with acquired resistance to EGFR-TKIs, T790M positive baseline genotyping (in tumor or plasma), and plasma samples collected at baseline and 6 weeks (wks) post- osimertinib (20–240 mg daily) treatment. Plasma samples were analyzed for the presence of detectable EGFR mutations (Ex19del, L858R and T790M) using BEAMing digital PCR (Sysmex/Inostics). In pts with detectable plasma EGFR mutations at baseline, clinical outcomes (by investigator, per RECIST 1.1) were compared for pts with or without detectable plasma EGFRmutations at 6 wks. Results: Evaluable baseline and 6 wk plasma samples were collected from 160 pts with T790M positive genotyping, of whom 143 had detectable EGFR mutations at baseline (median allelic fraction for Ex19del: 7.09%; L858R: 3.81%; T790M: 2.12%). In this cohort, the overall median progression-free survival (mPFS) was 9.3 months (m; 95% CI 8.2, 9.7). Clearance of plasma EGFRmutations at 6 wks was seen in 92/143 (64%) pts. mPFS was longer in pts with plasma clearance (10.9 m; 95% CI 9.5, 15.2) compared with pts without (5.5 m; 95% CI 3.9, 6.7), as was objective response rate (ORR; 70%; 95% CI 59%, 79% vs. 35%; 95% CI 22%, 50%). Conclusions: Clearance of plasma EGFR mutations after 6 wks of osimertinib therapy appears to be associated with improved ORR and mPFS in pts with T790M positive NSCLC. Evidence or lack of such a “plasma response” measured at 6 wks could, potentially, be used to predict subsequent outcomes on therapy. Further research is needed to better understand whether continued detection of plasma EGFR mutations at 6 wks may indicate the presence of heterogeneous resistance mechanisms, which could, potentially, be targeted by combination therapies. Validation of these results in an independent cohort of pts is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT02228369.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".