MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2890382105 · doi:10.1177/1753495x18793484

Mixed connective tissue disease in pregnancy: A case series and systematic literature review

2018· article· en· W2890382105 on OpenAlex
Marie-Lou Tardif, Michèle Mahone

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueObstetric Medicine · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiovascular Issues in Pregnancy
Canadian institutionsCentre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePregnancySeries (stratigraphy)ObstetricsConnective tissueDiseasePathologyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective To investigate the impact of medical and obstetric complications associated with mixed connective tissue disease (MCTD) in pregnancy. Method We analyzed 68 pregnancies from a systematic literature review and 12 pregnancies affected by MCTD at our centre between 1986 and 2015 for medical and obstetric complications. Results During pregnancy 37.1% had active MCTD and 26.7% had relapsed. Maternal complications included caesarean section (31.1%, n = 19), preeclampsia (17.6%, n = 13), thromboembolism events, and death (2.5%, n = 2 for each). Fetal complications included prematurity (48.1%, n = 25), intrauterine growth restriction (38.3%, n = 19), and neonatal lupus (28.6%, n = 18, including chondrodysplasia punctata). More than half ( n = 10) of the neonatal lupus cases were explained by anti-U 1 RNP only. The perinatal mortality rate was 17.7% ( n = 14). Pregnant women with active disease had higher rates of prematurity (OR = 7.60; 95%CI [1.93; 29.95]) and perinatal death (OR = 16.83; 95%CI [1.90; 147.70]). Conclusion MCTD in pregnancy puts women at risk of medical and obstetric complications, and disease activity probably increases this risk.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.012
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: Systematic review
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.807
Threshold uncertainty score0.996

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.012
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it