MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2890397926 · doi:10.1186/s13021-018-0105-5

Spatially-integrated estimates of net ecosystem exchange and methane fluxes from Canadian peatlands

2018· article· en· W2890397926 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueCarbon Balance and Management · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicPeatlands and Wetlands Ecology
Canadian institutionsEnvironment and Climate Change CanadaNatural Resources CanadaCanadian Forest Service
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPeatBogEnvironmental scienceBorealWetlandOmbrotrophicTaigaGrowing seasonPrimary productionEcosystemPhysical geographyEddy covarianceCarbon sinkHydrology (agriculture)ForestryEcologyGeographyGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Peatlands are an important component of Canada’s landscape, however there is little information on their national-scale net emissions of carbon dioxide [Net Ecosystem Exchange (NEE)] and methane (CH 4 ). This study compiled results for peatland NEE and CH 4 emissions from chamber and eddy covariance studies across Canada. The data were summarized by bog, poor fen and rich-intermediate fen categories for the seven major peatland containing terrestrial ecozones (Atlantic Maritime, Mixedwood Plains, Boreal Shield, Boreal Plains, Hudson Plains, Taiga Shield, Taiga Plains) that comprise > 96% of all peatlands nationally. Reports of multiple years of data from a single site were averaged and different microforms (e.g., hummock or hollow) within these peatland types were kept separate. A new peatlands map was created from forest composition and structure information that distinguishes bog from rich and poor fen. National Forest Inventory k-NN forest structure maps, bioclimatic variables (mean diurnal range and seasonality of temperatures) and ground surface slope were used to construct the new map. The Earth Observation for Sustainable Development map of wetlands was used to identify open peatlands with minor tree cover. The new map was combined with averages of observed NEE and CH 4 emissions to estimate a growing season integrated NEE (± SE) at − 108.8 (± 41.3) Mt CO 2 season −1 and CH 4 emission at 4.1 (± 1.5) Mt CH 4 season −1 for the seven ecozones. Converting CH 4 to CO 2 equivalent (CO 2 e; Global Warming Potential of 25 over 100 years) resulted in a total net sink of − 7.0 (± 77.6) Mt CO 2 e season −1 for Canada. Boreal Plains peatlands contributed most to the NEE sink due to high CO 2 uptake rates and large peatland areas, while Boreal Shield peatlands contributed most to CH 4 emissions due to moderate emission rates and large peatland areas. Assuming a winter CO 2 emission of 0.9 g CO 2 m −2 day −1 creates an annual CO 2 source (24.2 Mt CO 2 year −1 ) and assuming a winter CH 4 emission of 7 mg CH 4 m −2 day −1 inflates the total net source to 151.8 Mt CO 2 e year −1 . This analysis improves upon previous basic, aspatial estimates and discusses the potential sources of the high uncertainty in spatially integrated fluxes, indicating a need for continued monitoring and refined maps of peatland distribution for national carbon and greenhouse gas flux estimation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.223
Threshold uncertainty score0.919

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.199
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it