MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2890415448 · doi:10.1111/dom.13522

Glucagon‐like peptide‐1 receptor agonists for antipsychotic‐associated cardio‐metabolic risk factors: A systematic review and individual participant data meta‐analysis

2018· review· en· W2890415448 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueDiabetes Obesity and Metabolism · 2018
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDiabetes Treatment and Management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoCentre for Addiction and Mental Health
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchLundbeckfondenSteno Diabetes Center Copenhagen
KeywordsMedicineGlucagon-like peptide-1AntipsychoticGlucagon-like peptide 1 receptorMeta-analysisPharmacologyInternal medicineDiabetes mellitusEndocrinologyReceptorSchizophrenia (object-oriented programming)Type 2 diabetesAgonistPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

AIMS: To evaluate if glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) reduce antipsychotic-associated body weight gain in patients with schizophrenia, when compared to controls. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We systematically searched PubMed/EMBASE/PsycINFO/Cochrane using the search terms '(antipsychotic and GLP-1RA)'. Individual participant data from studies randomizing patients to GLP-1RA or control were meta-analysed. The primary outcome was difference in body weight between GLP-1RA and control; secondary outcomes included cardio-metabolic variables and adverse drug reactions (ADRs). Multiple linear regression was conducted including sex, age, psychosis severity, metabolic variable, ADRs, and GLP-1RA agent. RESULTS: Three studies (exenatide once-weekly = 2; liraglutide once-daily = 1) provided participant-level data (n = 164, age = 40.0 ± 11.1 years, body weight = 105.8 ± 20.8 kg). After 16.2 ± 4.0 weeks of treatment, body weight loss was 3.71 kg (95% CI = 2.44-4.99 kg) greater for GLP-1RA versus control (p < 0.001), number-needed-to-treat ≥5% body weight loss = 3.8 (95% CI = 2.6-7.2). Waist circumference, body mass index, HbA1c, fasting glucose and visceral adiposity were each significantly lower with GLP-1RA. Sex, age, psychosis severity, nausea, any ADR, and GLP-1RA agent did not significantly impact outcomes. Body weight loss with GLP-1RAs was greater for clozapine/olanzapine-treated patients (n = 141) than other antipsychotics (n = 27) (4.70 kg, 95% CI = 3.13-6.27 vs. 1.5 kg, 95% CI = -1.47-4.47) (p < 0.001). Nausea was more common with GLP-1RAs than control (53.6% vs. 27.5%, p = 0.002, number-needed-to-harm = 3.8). CONCLUSION: GLP-1RAs are effective and tolerable for antipsychotic-associated body weight gain, particularly clozapine/olanzapine-treated patients. With few included patients, further studies are required before making routine use recommendations for GLP-1RAs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Meta-epidemiology (broad)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: Meta-analysis
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.397
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0180.003
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.148
GPT teacher head0.346
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it