PS02.153: HER2 PATHWAY CONTROL SENSITIVITY TO CISPLATIN IN ESOPHAGEAL ADENOCARCINOMA CELL LINES
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background Adenocarcinoma of the esophagus is increasing in frequency and is the 6th most common cause of cancer death in North America. Cisplatin has been the backbone of neoadjuvant therapy but despite improved 5-year survival with neoadjuvant chemoradiation, many tumor cells survive chemotherapy leading to distant metastases. This study investigated the molecular changes in tumors when they become cisplatin resistant by focussing on the HER family of proteins. Methods We created 2 cisplatin resistant cell lines and a matching control by exposing the adenocarcinoma cell lines SK-GT-4 and FLO-1 to repeated cycles of cisplatin. Resistance to cisplatin was assessed at the end of the treatment. The expression levels of the HER family members was assessed. Cell proliferation, resistance to cisplatin and siRNA transfection were used to assess the role of HER family members in cisplatin resistance in EAC. Results The cisplatin resistant cell line displayed a lower rate of proliferation than the matching control (1.5 fold difference after 72h, P < 0.05). When the level of HER family members in the cisplatin resistant and control cell lines were measured, we observed a downregulation of HER2 in both cisplatin resistant cell lines (FLO-1: 78.31 mean expression (control) vs 17.43 mean expression (cisplatin resistant), P < 0.05), whereas the EGFR level were unchanged (FLO-1: 154.76 mean expression (control) vs 137.64 mean expression (cisplatin resistant), P > 0.05). In order to confirm this observation, we downregulated HER2 by siRNA and by a HER2 specific inhibitor in control cells. Resistance to cisplatin was similar to the cisplatin resistant cell lines (3.33μM cisplatin for 72h, death rate: 72.1% control vs 23.6% HER2 siRNA, P < 0.05). Similar results were observed in two other EAC cell lines (OE33 And JHESO-AD1). Conclusion Our results suggest that there is a correlation between HER2 level/activity and cisplatin resistance in EAC cells. It appears that as EAC cells acquire cisplatin resistance, they block the HER2 pathway. Disclosure All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".