MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Abstract 14163: The Single Ventricle Reconstruction (SVR) Trial at 6 Years: Transplant-Free Survival, Catheter Interventions, and Morbidity

2015· article· en· W2890457219 on OpenAlexaff
Jane W. Newburger, Lynn A. Sleeper, J. William Gaynor, Danielle Hollenbeck-Pringle, Peter C. Frommelt, Jennifer Li, William T. Mahle, Ismée A. Williams, Andrew M. Atz, Kristin M. Burns, Shan Chen, James Cnota, Carolyn Dunbar‐Masterson, Nancy S. Ghanayem, Caren S. Goldberg, Jeffrey P. Jacobs, Alan B. Lewis, Seema Mital, Christian Pizarro, Aaron Eckhauser, Paul Stark, Richard G. Ohye

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Structural Anomalies and Repair
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick Children
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineVentricleCatheterPsychological interventionRandomized controlled trialInternal medicineSurgeryIntensive care medicineCardiologyNursing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: In the SVR trial, 1-year (y) transplant (tx)-free survival was better for the Norwood procedure with right ventricle-to-pulmonary artery shunt (RVPAS) vs modified Blalock-Taussig shunt (MBTS). At 6 y, we compared tx-free survival, unplanned interventions, morbidities, New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class, and RV ejection fraction (RVEF) by assigned shunt. Methods and Results: The SVR trial treated 549 pts. Vital status and medical history were ascertained annually. Tx-free survival in the RVPAS (63.5%) vs MBTS (58.7%) groups did not differ (Figure; log-rank P=.13). Similarly, neither mortality nor tx alone differed by shunt type. By 6 y, RVPAS pts had a higher incidence of any catheter intervention (.38 vs .23/pt-yr, P<.001), balloon angioplasty (P=.014), stent (P=.009), and coiling (P<.001). The % of pts with morbidities by 6 y were similar in the groups, with overall rates: pacemaker 3%, thrombosis 16%, stroke 7%, seizures 13%, protein losing enteropathy 3%, plastic bronchitis 0.5%, and 6-y NYHA Class I 71%, II 21%, III 3%, and IV 5%. Among pre-specified subgroups, worse tx-free survival was associated with low birth weight (<2500 g); worse pre-Norwood tricuspid regurgitation (≥2.5 mm jet width); lower surgeon Norwood volume; preterm birth (<37 wks); and combined aortic atresia and pre-term birth (all P<.01). Subgroup x shunt interaction was significant only for surgeon volume levels (P<.05); in the highest volume group (n >15/y), the MBTS was beneficial (P<.04), and in 3 lower volume groups, the RVPAS was qualitatively better. In 6-y echoes read to date, RVEF was similar in the RVPAS vs MBTS groups (46±7, n=55 vs 46±6%, n=48; P=.9). Conclusions: By 6 y, tx-free survival was an absolute 4.8% higher for pts assigned to the RVPAS vs MBTS group, but the difference no longer reached statistical significance, and they needed more catheter interventions. Rates of death, tx, and morbidities; distribution of NYHA Class; and RVEF were each similar in the shunt groups.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.251
Threshold uncertainty score0.221

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.075
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculationSame topicCardiac Structural Anomalies and RepairFrench-language works237,207