Bibliographic record
Abstract
Over the last eight years Jules Findley’s practice has developed by looking at issues in bereavement using the material of paper. The research examines the emotions that contribute to this life changing event, affect, the psychological theory of attachment and detachment. Through making hand made paper, sculpture using paper clay Jules Findley uses the methodologies of display, play and experimentation to materialise new outcomes. In the work of bereavement it has led to questioning in-depth areas of contemporary funeral rites, as well as sensitively exploring death of a loved one and an understanding the emotions around grief. Research ideas from the wider context of grief and domesticity are conceptually formed through asking questions and in installations raising public awareness. I am interested in making the Residence with Linda Duvall as it will expand the horizons of my work. I would like to document the landscape. The landscape in Territory 6 has historical connections to the native Indians that used to live on the land. The land is flat and open like East Anglia in the UK. I am interested in collecting the soil for making hand made paper at home in response to the Residence. This would form the opportunity for new work and the work would be fed back to Linda Duvall. The work would also make opportunities for new exhibition work. Venue to be decided. My work is concerned with maternal grief, and loss as well as M’Otherhood, the abject mother, which also includes loss of the child, and the materialities of these being expressed through hand made paper and sculpture using paper based clay.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".