Assay of international experience in accreditation of continuing professional development of medical workers
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The system of continuing medical education, continuing professional development of medical workers is widespread all over the world, but there are different approaches and peculiarities of its organization. Standards and requirements for the planning and provision of continuing education and certification system, that confirms the implementation of these standards and requirements, have long been developed and are being used in Europe and North America. An important link in the organization and providing high quality postgraduate education for doctors is the accreditation of educational activities. The analysis of existing models of accreditation of educational activities in the US, Canada and EU countries has showed that the accreditation of educational activities in these countries has its own characteristics. The most perfect, effective and internationally recognized model can be considered the provider accreditation of continuing medical education in the United States. Also there is highly effective combined model of accreditation which is used in Canada. On the way to further development and improvement of the system of postgraduate education in Ukraine, important place occupies the use of the experience of countries with a stable, highly effective continuing system of professional training and education of medical workers taking into account national peculiarities, the existing accreditation model and the educational infrastructure. The introduction of the most effective model of accreditation in Ukraine will facilitate Ukraine's access to the international community of continuing medical education, continuing professional development of medical workers.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".