Adenosine A <sub>3</sub> Receptor Expression and Function in Mitochondria
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Mitochondrial dysfunction is emerging as a common mechanism of a variety of neurodegenerative diseases, including chemotherapy‐induced neuropathic pain. We have recently found that administration of selective agonists to the G protein‐coupled, adenosine A 3 receptor (A 3 AR) prevents the development of chemotherapy‐induced mitochondrial dysfunction in peripheral sensory neurons that result peripheral neuropathy and chronic pain. Recent evidence also indicates the presence of G proteins and G‐coupled protein receptors within mitochondria, including the adenosine A 1 and A 2A receptors. Bioinformatic analysis revealed potential mitochondrial‐associated sequences in published A 3 AR protein sequences, thus prompting us to hypothesize that A 3 AR is associated with mitochondria and its signaling could regulate mitochondrial function. Using Western blot analysis and transmission immune‐electron microscopy, we report for the first time that A 3 AR is present in normal rat mitochondria purified from liver, spinal cord and peripheral blood lymphocytes. Moreover, we also report that when normal rodent mitochondria are pretreated with the selective A 3 AR agonist, MRS5890, they produced more ATP following ADP‐stimulation than mitochondria treated with its vehicle (0.002% DMSO). We also find that MRS5980 counteracts normal mitochondrial membrane depolarization during calcium mobilization. Collectively, our data provide the first evidence for the presence A 3 AR in mitochondria and initial mechanistic insight to its functional role in mitochondria that potentially could serve as a target for the treatment of neurodegenerative disease. Support or Funding Information NIH‐NCI CA169519
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".