MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A randomized phase 2 study investigating 3 dosing regimens of radium-223 dichloride (Ra-223) in bone metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC).

2018· article· en· W2890576827 on OpenAlexaff
Cora N. Sternberg, Fred Saad, Julie N. Graff, Avivit Peer, Ulka N. Vaishampayan, Eugene Leung, Eli Rosenbaum, Howard Gurney, Richard J. Epstein, Ian D. Davis, Bingyan Wu, Lucia Trandafir, Volker Jean Wagner, Maha Hussain

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRadiopharmaceutical Chemistry and Applications
Canadian institutionsOttawa HospitalCentre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineProstate cancerRadium-223DosingOncologyInternal medicineCancerCastrationBone metastasisHormone

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

5008 Background: Ra-223, standard dose (SD) 55 kBq/kg q4w for 6 cycles improved overall survival (OS) and delayed time to symptomatic skeletal events (SSEs) in patients (pts) with mCRPC and bone metastases in the ALSYMPCA study (Parker C, N Engl J Med. 2013;369(3):213-23). The current study investigated different Ra-223 treatment regimens in a similar patient population. Methods: Pts with bone mCRPC were randomized 1:1:1 to Ra-223 SD or Ra-223 high dose (HD) 88 kBq/kg q4w for up to 6 cycles, or to Ra-223 SD extended (EXT) q4w for up to 12 cycles. The primary objective was to compare SSE-free survival (SSE-FS) between HD and SD, and EXT and SD. Hypothesis testing was performed at a 2-sided alpha level of 0.20 with no adjustment for multiplicity. Results: 391 pts were randomized; baseline characteristics were well balanced. No statistically significant differences in SSE-FS were observed between Ra-223 SD and HD [median 12.3 vs 12.9 months, hazard ratio (HR) 1.06, 80% CI 0.88–1.27, p = 0.70] or Ra-223 SD and EXT [median 13.2 vs 10.8 months, HR 1.26, 80% CI 0.94–1.69, p = 0.31]. Median OS was 15.8, 16.0 and 14.4 months in the SD, HD and EXT arms, respectively. A total of 370 pts received Ra-223 with a median number of doses of 6 in each arm. The most frequent treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were fatigue, anemia and nausea. Grade ≥3 TEAEs were noted in 34%, 48% and 53% of pts in the SD, HD and EXT arms, respectively. The most frequent grade ≥3 TEAEs overall were anemia (13%), bone pain (5%), thrombocytopenia (4%) and hypertension (4%). TEAEs leading to permanent discontinuation occurred in 9%, 16% and 17% of pts in the SD, HD and EXT arms, respectively. Conclusions: No statistically significant differences in SSE-FS were noted between Ra-223 SD and HD or Ra-223 SD and EXT. However, HD and EXT arms had a higher incidence of grade ≥3 TEAEs than the SD arm. The study supports the currently approved dose and schedule of Ra-223. Clinical trial information: NCT02023697.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.354
Threshold uncertainty score0.925

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.225
GPT teacher head0.552
Teacher spread0.327 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical OncologySame topicRadiopharmaceutical Chemistry and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207