Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Unconventional UAVs are being proposed to combine the benefits of fixed-wing and rotary-wing aircraft. Among these are tailsitter aircraft, which are fixed-wing aircraft with vertical landing capability. In this work, we present the development of a real-time simulation of a commercial radio-controlled tailsitter aircraft, along with a single controller that is capable of executing vertical takeoff, level flight, and vertical landing. The model accounts for progressive stall, the effect of large control surface deflections, as well as the drag generated by the aircraft's structural components. The thruster model accounts for changes in battery voltage, inflow velocity, and predicts slipstream effects. A ground contact model is also implemented to allow simulation of the takeoff and landing phases. A cascaded quaternion-based controller is then implemented in this simulated environment to control the tailsitter in a typical flight mission, with promising results. The transition from level flight to hover proves to be the most challenging aspect in the control of this aircraft.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it