MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Dynamic angiogenic switch as predictor of response to chemotherapy+ bevacizumab in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

2016· article· en· W2890579724 on OpenAlexaff
Antonio Cubillo, Rafael Álvarez-Gallego, Manuel Muñoz, Gregory R. Pond, Gema María Varó Sánchez, M. Segura Martín, Jesús Rodríguez-Pascual, Elena Garralda, Estela Vega, Rodrigo A. Toledo, Emilio Vicente, Yolanda Quijano, César Muñoz, Lisardo Ugidos, Manuel Hidalgo, Sofía Perea

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicColorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies
Canadian institutionsOntario Clinical Oncology Group
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineBevacizumabIrinotecanCapecitabineOxaliplatinInternal medicineOncologyColorectal cancerAngiogenesisChemotherapyPlacental growth factorMetastasisCancerGastroenterologyVascular endothelial growth factorVEGF receptors

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

e15126 Background: There is a need to develop biomarkers to predict the outcome of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) treated with chemotherapy (Ch) plus Bevacizumab (B). It has been reported that during exposure to B there is a switch in the plasma levels of angiogenesis growth factors and related cytokines called angiogenic switch (AS). It is not known if variations in AS among patients is related to the response to treatment with angiogenesis inhibitors. This study aimed to determine the influence of AS in the PFS of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated with Ch + B. Methods: Patients with untreated metastatic colorectal cancer with ECOG 0-1 performance status 0-1 were eligible. Patients received treatment with standard dose capecitabine plus either oxaliplatin or irinotecan and bevacizumab for six cycles either followed by maintenance treatment with bevacizumab plus capecitabine until progression. Angiogenic related cytokines (HGF, PIGF, MCP-3, MM-9, Eotaxin, bFGF and IL-18) were prospectively analyzed at baseline and every eight weeks). AS + was defined by A) doubling of PIGF compared to baseline or B) PIGF elevation with a simultaneous elevation of any two of bFGF, HGF, MCP-3, IL-18 or MMP-9 compared to baseline Results: Of 71 patients, 41 (57.8%) progressed with a median PFS of 10,1 (95% CI: 8.3 to 13,7) months. Forty-five (63.4%) patients developed an AS including 28 patients were AS + observed at first evaluation. Thirty five, six, and four patients were deemed AS + based on both criteria, criteria A or B respectively.. Median PFS for the 45 patients with AS was 11,4 (95% CI:8,6 to 15,8) months versus 8.3 (95% CI: 5.6 to 16.4) months in the 26 AS - patients (p = 0.04). The overall disease control rate (PR + CR + stable disease in AS + patients was 96% versus 58 % in AS – patients (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Development of AS is associated with better PFS and disease control in patients with metastatic CRC treated with bevacizumab in combination with chemotherapy. These data support continuing studying dynamic changes in circulating angiogenic factors and cytokines as markers of angiogenesis inhibitors effectiveness. Clinical trial information: NCT02075086.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.417
Teacher spread0.383 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical OncologySame topicColorectal Cancer Treatments and StudiesFrench-language works237,207