MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Phase 1b extension study of cancer stemness inhibitor BB608 (napabucasin) administered in combination with FOLFIRI +/- bevacizumab (Bev) in patients (pts) with advanced colorectal cancer (CRC).

2016· article· en· W2890697824 on OpenAlexaff
Bert H. O’Neil, Joleen M. Hubbard, Alexander Starodub, Derek J. Jonker, William J. Edenfield, Bassel F. El‐Rayes, Þorvarður R. Hálfdánarson, Ramesh K. Ramanathan, Henry C. Pitot, Carolyn D. Britten, Bamidele Adesunloye, Axel Grothey, Laura Borodyansky, Chiang Li

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
TopicBioactive Compounds and Antitumor Agents
Canadian institutionsOttawa HospitalUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineFOLFIRIBevacizumabInternal medicineColorectal cancerGastroenterologyAdverse effectIrinotecanCancerOncologySurgeryChemotherapy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

3564 Background: BB608 (aka Napabucasin, BBI-608) is an oral first-in-class cancer stemness inhibitor targeting Stat3-driven gene transcription. Anti-tumor activity was observed in vitro and in vivo. BB608 showed safety and encouraging signs of anti-cancer activity in phase I/II studies. Methods: A phase Ib extension multi-center study in pts with advanced CRC was undertaken to confirm the RP2D and signs of anti-cancer activity of BB608 in combination with FOLFIRI +/- Bev. BB608 was administered continuously at 240 mg BID in combination with FOLFIRI (5-FU 400 mg/m2 bolus with 2400 mg/m2, irinotecan 180 mg/m2, and leucovorin 400 mg/m2 infusion) +/- Bev 5 mg/kg, administered bi-weekly until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or other discontinuation criterion. Results: 46 pretreated CRC pts who had failed an average of > 2 prior lines of therapy were enrolled; including 20 pts (43.5%) previously progressed on FOLFIRI +/- Bev. Of the 46 pts, 14 received FOLFIRI and 32 FOLFIRI with Bev in combination with BB608. There was no dose-limiting or unexpected toxicity or significant pharmacokinetic interactions. Most common adverse events (AEs) included grade 1/2 diarrhea, nausea, vomiting and fatigue. Grade 3 AEs observed in 15 pts included diarrhea (9), fatigue (3), dehydration/hyponatremia (1), hypokalemia (1) and burning in rectum (1) resolved with dose reduction and/or supportive care. Disease control (PR+SD) was observed in 37 of 40 evaluable pts (93%), with partial response (PR) in 11 pts (28%) (RECIST 1.1 30-65% regression), and stable disease with tumor regression in 21 pts (53%). Among 19 pts who had progressed on FOLFIRI +/- Bev previously and were evaluable for tumor assessment, disease control (PR+SD) was observed in 17 pts (90%), tumor regression was observed in 15 pts (80%) of which 6 pts achieved PR (32%). Conclusions: This phase Ib extension study confirmed that BB608 can be safely combined with FOLFIRI +/- Bev, and shows encouraging signs of anti-tumor activity in CRC pts, including pts who had previously progressed on FOLFIRI +/- Bev. Clinical trial information: NCT02024607.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.201
Threshold uncertainty score0.674

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.207
GPT teacher head0.546
Teacher spread0.340 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical OncologySame topicBioactive Compounds and Antitumor AgentsFrench-language works237,207