MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Immunologic and genomic characterization of high grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) in patients (pts) treated with pembrolizumab (Pembro) in the phase II INSPIRE trial.

2017· article· en· W2890710292 on OpenAlexaff
Ilaria Colombo, Scott Lien, Cindy Yang, Derek Clouthier, Luisa Bonilla, Sunu Cyriac, Josée-Lyne Ethier, Yeh Chen Lee, Yada Kanjanapan, Victoria Mandilaras, Neesha C. Dhani, Marcus O. Butler, Amit M. Oza, Judy Quintos, Helen Chow, Trevor J. Pugh, Pamela S. Ohashi, Lillian L. Siu, Stéphanie Lheureux

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
Canadian institutionsPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreUniversity Health Network
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePembrolizumabInternal medicineOncologyCancerPathologyImmunotherapy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

5581 Background: Checkpoint inhibitors have shown to be effective in different tumors and are under investigation in HGSOC. Methods: INSPIRE (NCT02644369) is a prospective multi-cohort study investigating tumor genomic and immune landscapes in pts treated with Pembro at 200 mg IV Q3W. Patients underwent tumor biopsy pre, on-treatment and at progression for DNA/RNA sequence, immune-profile, and PD-L1 expression by immunohistochemistry (IHC). Serial blood samples for immunophenotyping were collected. Correlative data are available for 6 pts: 3 with shrinkage in target lesion and 3 with progressive disease (PD). Results: At interim analysis as of January 2017, 18 pts with HGSOC have been enrolled and 16 have platinum-resistant disease, with median 3 prior lines of treatment (range 1-7). Of 14 evaluable pts, best response by RECIST 1.1 was stable disease (SD) in 5 (36%) and PD in 9 (64%). Mean Tumor Proportion Score of PD-L1 by IHC (Qualtek) was 6.4% (range 0-30%). Grade 3/4 adverse events possibly related to Pembro were observed in 4/18 (22%) pts; none was fatal and the most common were fatigue and hyponatremia. Preliminary correlative data showed no significant change in CD4, CD8 and myeloid-derived suppressor cells in peripheral blood after Pembro treatment. Mean PD-1 expression on CD4 and CD8 T cells on baseline tumor tissue (measured as product of PD-1+ cells and the per cell expression of PD-1 [% of mean fluorescence intensity]) was significantly higher in pts with tumor shrinkage compared to pts with PD (CD4: 2658 vs 678, p = .02; CD8: 1999 vs 451, p = .048). Genomic analysis of baseline tumor tissue was available for 3 pts with tumor shrinkage and 2 with PD. Mean mutation burden was higher for pts with tumor shrinkage (2.38 vs 1.0 mutations/Mb covered). The pt with the longest SD in our cohort (6 months) had the highest mutation burden (2.72), including somatic POLE (c.6331-6C > G) and germline BRCA2mutations. Conclusions: In HGSOC, pts with higher PD-1 level on tumor CD4 and CD8 T cells and higher mutation burden at baseline may have a better outcome following treatment with Pembro. POLE mutation is rare in HGSOC but may correlate with checkpoint inhibitor activity. Clinical trial information: NCT02644369.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.081
GPT teacher head0.418
Teacher spread0.337 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical Oncology→Same topicCancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers→French-language works237,207→