MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Multi-platform characterization of cutaneous melanoma from patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors.

2018· article· en· W2890809656 on OpenAlexaff
Dan Moldoveanu, Mathieu Lajoie, Xiu Huang, Maria Lvova, Julie Y. Tse, Stephen Lyle, Alexei Protopopov, M.G.V.M. Russel, Matthew Dankner, Sonia V. del Rincón, Léon C.L.T. van Kempen, Alan Spatz, Wilson H. Miller, Kevin Petrecca, Béatrice Wang, Sarkis Meterissian, Kevin Watters, Catalin Mihalcioiu, Dana Vuzman, Ian R. Watson

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
Canadian institutionsOccupational Cancer Research CentreRoyal Victoria HospitalMcGill University Health CentreJewish General HospitalMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineMelanomaImmune systemImmunotherapyOncologyEosinophilImmune checkpointPembrolizumabCancer researchImmunologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

e15071 Background: Therapeutics targeting inhibitory immune checkpoints have revolutionized the treatment of advanced and metastatic melanoma. Clinical trials of dual treatment with anti-CTLA4 and anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibodies observed up to 57.6% response rates with 11.5% of patients achieving complete response and 13.1% having stable disease for over 12 months of follow-up (Larkin et al. 2015). However, side effects continue to be a major problem with over 40% of patients reporting a severe adverse event. A number of groups have identified that tumour mutation burden, gene expression signatures and tumor aneuploidy are predictors of immunotherapy response (reviewed in Sharma et al. 2017). A significant knowledge gap remains regarding which combination of factors best predict a priori response to immune checkpoint inhibitors. Methods: We performed a multi-platform integrative analysis of 42 regional metastatic melanoma samples from patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors. Platforms included in this study were focused sequencing of >400 cancer-associated genes using the CANCERPLEX platform from Kew Group Inc., DNA copy number, 7-colour immunofluorescence of immune infiltration markers, and analysis of peripheral blood. Results: Our focused sequencing gene panel was shown to predict tumour mutation burden and to accurately identify known melanoma driver mutations. Tumour lymphocyte infiltration predicted immune checkpoint response, and highly infiltrated tumours had improved survival (p<0.05). Furthermore, elevated pre-treatment eosinophil and basophil counts were associated with improved treatment response, while high lactate dehydrogenase levels were associated with poor survival and decreased response rates. Conclusions: This study adds to a growing body of knowledge to understand the molecular determinants of response to immune checkpoint inhibitors to further personalize melanoma care.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.371
Teacher spread0.317 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical Oncology→Same topicCancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers→French-language works237,207→