MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

CheckMate 602: An open-label, randomized, phase 3 trial of combinations of nivolumab, elotuzumab, pomalidomide and dexamethasone in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma.

2017· article· en· W2890915407 on OpenAlexaff
Sagar Lonial, Paul G. Richardson, Donna Reece, Hesham Mohamed, Suresh G. Shelat, Jesús F. San Miguel

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMultiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
Canadian institutionsPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPomalidomideMedicineNivolumabInternal medicinePembrolizumabLenalidomideDexamethasoneOncologyRefractory (planetary science)Progressive diseaseMultiple myelomaImmunotherapyChemotherapyCancer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

TPS8052 Background: Multiple myeloma (MM) cells may evade immune surveillance by suppressing immune responses through the PD-1 pathway, via upregulation of PD-L1.1Nivolumab (nivo), a PD-1 immune checkpoint inhibitor that blocks PD-L1 interaction and disrupts MM-mediated PD-1 signaling, demonstrated modest activity as monotherapy in patients (pts) with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) in a phase 1b study.2 Pomalidomide, an immunomodulatory drug (IMiD), may sensitize MM cells to PD-1 blockade, and has shown efficacy with dexamethasone (Pd) for RRMM. Elotuzumab (elo), an anti-SLAMF7 monoclonal antibody, directly activates natural killer cells and facilitates antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity. Preclinical work suggests PD-1 blockade may enhance elo efficacy3; thus nivo + Pd + elo may increase clinical benefit. Methods: CheckMate 602 (NCT02726581) is a phase 3, open-label, randomized study of efficacy and safety of nivo + Pd (N-Pd) vs Pd in pts with RRMM. Nivo combined with elo + Pd (NE-Pd) will be evaluated in an exploratory arm. Eligible pts must have measurable MM after ≥2 prior lines of therapy (LoTs) that included an IMiD and proteasome inhibitor, each for ≥2 consecutive cycles, alone or combined, and be refractory to their last LoT. Pts with prior elo are eligible. A planned 406 pts will be randomized 3:3:1 to N-Pd, Pd and NE-Pd, stratified by LoT (2 vs 3+) and International Staging System disease stage (I–II vs III). Pts in the Pd arm may cross over to the NE-Pd arm at disease progression. Pts are enrolled at 119 sites in 13 countries. Coprimary endpoints (N-Pd and Pd arms): objective response rate (ORR) and progression-free survival (PFS), assessed by an independent review committee. Secondary endpoints (N-Pd and Pd arms): time to response, duration of response, investigator-assessed ORR and PFS. Exploratory endpoints include ORR and PFS (NE-Pd arm), and safety/tolerability and minimal residual disease status (all arms). 1. Liu et al. Blood 2007;110:296–304 2. Lesokhin et al. JCO 2016;34:2698–704 3. Bezman et al. Haematologica 2016;101:161–2 [S450] Study support: BMS. Writing support: A Gill, Caudex, funded by BMS. Clinical trial information: NCT02726581.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.033

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.265
GPT teacher head0.548
Teacher spread0.284 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical OncologySame topicMultiple Myeloma Research and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207