MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Characteristics and predictors of pain in patients with newly diagnosed and relapsed acute leukemia (AL).

2017· article· en· W2890999691 on OpenAlexaff
Adir Shaulov, Gary Rodin, Anne Rydall, Gordana Popović, Aaron D. Schimmer, Lisa W. Le, Camilla Zimmermann

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeutropenia and Cancer Infections
Canadian institutionsPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreUniversity Health Network
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineInternal medicineDiseasePopulationMalignancyDistressCancer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

e21633 Background: AL is a hematopoietic stem cell malignancy associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. The prevalence, correlates and causes for pain in this population have not been well studied. We present the results of a large cross-sectional study of pain in individuals with AL. Methods: Patients with newly-diagnosed or recently-relapsed AL admitted to a large tertiary cancer center completed the Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale (MSAS, which has subscales of prevalence, severity, frequency and distress, with ratings of 0 = none, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe, 4 = very severe). Demographic information, and disease and treatment variables were recorded. Two raters completed chart reviews in duplicate (with discussion of discordant results) for patients with severe pain (MSAS severity ≥3/4) to assess the site of pain. Results: A total of 362 patients were recruited from January 2008 to October 2013: 249 (68.8%) with AML, 80 (22.1%) ALL and 33 (9.1%) APL. Of these, 326 (90.1%) were newly diagnosed and 36 (9.9%) had relapsed disease; 346 (95.6%) were treated with (re)induction chemotherapy. Of 360 who completed the MSAS, pain was reported in 174 (48.3%), of whom 34.4% scored ≥3/4 on severity, 43.1% on frequency, and 44.3% on distress related to the pain. On multivariable analysis, patients reporting pain were more likely to be younger (OR 0.98 old vs young, p < 0.001), and to have ALL (OR 0.57 AML vs ALL, p < 0.05); duration of illness, gender, education, income and treatment intensity were not associated with pain. Pain was correlated with difficulty sleeping, worrying, difficulty concentrating, and feeling sad, nervous or irritable (all p < 0.001). Of the 60 patients reporting severe pain (≥3/4), its site was identified in 53 (88.3%). The most common sites were oropharynx (29.7%), head (18.9%), abdomen (14.9%) and musculoskeletal (12.2%). Only 1.1% (4/362) of the cohort was referred to the palliative care/symptom control team over the month prior to or following assessment. Conclusions: Pain is a frequent and distressing symptom in patients with newly diagnosed or relapsed AL. Further research is needed to assess the efficacy of supportive care interventions in this population.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.386
Teacher spread0.350 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical OncologySame topicNeutropenia and Cancer InfectionsFrench-language works237,207