Efectos del entrenamiento compuesto integramente por tareas de fútbol en el rendimiento neuromuscular y cardiovascular de futbolistas amateurs
Bibliographic record
Abstract
espanolLos objetivos de este estudio fueron, por un lado, valorar la capacidad de aceleracion (SP20m y SP30m), la capacidad de cambiar de direccion (CODA, 505 test) y la capacidad cardiovascular (test de la Universidad de Montreal, UMT) en futbolistas amateurs que competian en Tercera Division (TD) y Regional Preferente (RP) del futbol espanol, y por otro, analizar la evolucion de la condicion fisica durante el periodo competitivo (septiembrenoviembre; 12 semanas de liga). Veinticuatro jugadores de futbol amateur de un mismo club pero de distinto nivel competitivo (TD y RP) participaron en el estudio (19,78 ± 1,24 anos, 76,05 ± 8,77 kg, 1,79 ± 0,07 m, 23,57 ± 1,85 kg/m2 ). Los futbolistas no completaron ningun contenido especifico de preparacion fisica en las sesiones de entrenamiento. Despues de las 12 semanas de entrenamiento, no se encontraron diferencias significativas (p > 0,05, TE EnglishThis research aimed at analyzing the capacity for acceleration (SP20m and SP30m), change of direction (CODA, 505 test) and cardiovascular capacity (University Montreal Test, UMT) of soccer players competing at the Spanish Third Division (TD) and Regional Preferential (RP). Moreover, this study analyzed the evolution in players' physical fitness over a 12-week period of competition for both teams (September-November), aiming at detecting possible interactions among the different capacities above mentioned. Twenty-four amateurs’ soccer players of the same club took part in this study (19.78 ± 1.24 years, 76.05 ± 8.77 kg, 1.79 ± 0.07 m, 23.57 ± 1.85 kg/m2 ). Participants did not complete any specific content of physical preparation throughout the training sessions. After 3 training months, no significant differences (p > 0.05, TE, effect size
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".