MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2891024151 · doi:10.1109/jssc.2018.2865474

A 0.13-<inline-formula> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$\mu\text{m}$ </tex-math> </inline-formula> CMOS SoC for Simultaneous Multichannel Optogenetics and Neural Recording

2018· article· en· W2891024151 on OpenAlexafffund
Gabriel Gagnon-Turcotte, Mehdi Noormohammadi Khiarak, Christian Éthier, Yves De Koninck, Benoit Gosselin

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicPhotoreceptor and optogenetics research
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
FundersWeston Brain InstituteCMC MicrosystemsUniversité LavalNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNorthwestern University
KeywordsCMOSEffective number of bitsOversamplingDelta-sigma modulationComputer scienceDecimationChipNoise (video)Electronic engineeringSuccessive approximation ADCIntegratorNoise shapingElectrical engineeringBandwidth (computing)Filter (signal processing)EngineeringCapacitorVoltageTelecommunicationsArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a 0.13-μm CMOS system-onchip (SoC) for simultaneous multichannel optogenetics and multichannel neural recording in freely moving laboratory animals. This fully integrated system provides 10 multimodal recording channels with analog-to-digital conversion and a fourchannel LED driver circuit for optogenetic stimulation. The bio-amplifier design includes a programmable bandwidth (BW) (0.5 Hz-7 kHz) to collect either the action potentials (APs) and/or the local field potentials (LFPs) and has a noise efficiency factor (NEF) of 2.30 for an input-referred noise of 3.2 μVrms within a BW of 10-7 kHz. The low-power delta-sigma (ΔΣ) MASH 1-1-1 analog-to-digital converter (ADC) is designed to work at low oversampling ratios (OSRs) (≤50) and has an effective number of bits (ENOB) of 9.75 bits at an OSR of 25 (BW of 10 kHz). The utilization of a ΔΣ ADC is the key to address the flexibility needed to address different noise versus power consumption tradeoff of various experimental settings. It leverages a new technique that reduces its size by subtracting the output of each ΔΣ branch in the digital domain, instead of in the analog domain as done conventionally. The ADC is followed by an on-chip fourthorder cascaded integrator-comb (CIC4) decimation filter (DF). A whole recording channel, including the bio-amplifier, the ΔΣ MASH 1-1-1, and the DF consumes 11.2 μW. Optical stimulation is performed with an LED driver using a regulated cascode current source with feedback that can accommodate a wide range of LED parameters and battery voltages. The SoC is validated in vivo within a wireless experimental platform in both the ventral posteromedial nucleus (VPM) and cerebral motor cortex brain regions of a virally mediated Channelrhodopsin-2 (ChR2) rat.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.053
Threshold uncertainty score0.178

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0530.031

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.326
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations54
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Journal of Solid-State CircuitsSame topicPhotoreceptor and optogenetics researchFrench-language works237,207