MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2891121470 · doi:10.14748/adipo.v9.4989

Obesity related alterations in pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of drugs: emerging clinical implications in obese patients - part I

2018· article· en· W2891121470 on OpenAlexaff
István G. Télessy, Harpal S. Buttar

Bibliographic record

VenueAdipobiology · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPharmacology and Obesity Treatment
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePharmacokineticsPharmacodynamicsObesityDosingInternal medicineCmaxDiabetes mellitusDrugPharmacologyEndocrinology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Obesity is escalating among children and adults all over the world. This non-communicable disorder contributes heavily to se­vere morbidity and mortality in humans due to the occurrence of diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular diseases, osteoarthritis, and some cancers. Excess deposition of white adipose tissue in obese patients produces hormone like bioactive substances that pro­duce inflammatory cytokines, atherosclerosis and cardiovascular diseases, to name a few. Obesity can also cause pathophysiolo­gal changes in liver, kidney, and GI tract that can affect drug disposition, resulting in therapeutic failure or toxic drug reactions. Alterations in drug absorption, distribution, metabolism and excretion (ADME), ie. pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynam­ics (PD) have been observed in lean and obese patients. A limited number of studies have shown significant differences in the PK parameters such as Vd, CL, t1/2, Tmax, Cmax, and AUC of drugs (e.g., antimicrobials, chemotherapeutics, anesthetics, CNS agents) in obese and lean patients. In view of these observations, clinical responses to medications can markedly differ between non-obese and obese patients, and this phenomenon can lead to improper dosing, often leaving obese patients mistreated for their ailments. Morbidly obese patients are more likely to wake up during surgical interventions done under general anesthesia, es­pecially propofol. It is therefore imparative that the loading and maintinance dose of drugs, especially anesthetics and lipophilic agents, should be adjusted in obese patients. Further, obese men, women and children should be enrolled in clinical trials to determine the safety and efficacy of pharmaceuticals. The focus of this review is to highlight the relationship of obesity-related alterations in drug ADME and to provide an updated overview about the PK and PD changes observed for a wide spectrum of drugs in obese and non-obese patients. Literature-based recommendations for rational therapeutic dose-modifications are also provided in the publication. Keywords: absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion (ADME), overweight, obesity, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynam­ics, drug dose adjustment, obese patients

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.378
Teacher spread0.356 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAdipobiologySame topicPharmacology and Obesity TreatmentFrench-language works237,207