Physical exercise prevents alterations in purinergic system and oxidative status in lipopolysaccharide‐induced sepsis in rats
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Sepsis is a generalized infection that involves alterations in inflammatory parameters, oxidant status, and purinergic signaling in many tissues. Physical exercise has emerged as a tool to prevent this disease because of its anti-inflammatory and antioxidant properties. Thus, in this study, we investigated the effects of physical exercise on preventing alterations in purinergic system components, oxidative stress, and inflammatory parameters in lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced sepsis in rats. Male Wistar rats were divided into four groups: control, exercise (EX), LPS, and EX+LPS. The resisted physical exercise was performed for 12 weeks on a ladder with 1 m height. After 72 hours of the last exercise session, the animals received 2.5 mg/kg of LPS for induction of sepsis, and after 24 hours, lungs and blood samples were collected for analysis. The results showed that the exercise protocol used was able to prevent, in septic animals: (1) the increase in body temperature; (2) the increase of lipid peroxidation and reactive species levels in the lung, (3) the increase in adenosine triphosphate levels in serum; (4) the change in the activity of the enzymes ectonucleotidases in lymphocytes, partially; (5) the change in the density of purinergic enzymes and receptors in the lung, and (6) the increase of IL-6 and IL-1β gene expression. Our results revealed the involvement of purinergic signaling and oxidative damage in the mechanisms by which exercise prevents sepsis aggravations. Therefore, the regular practice of physical exercise is encouraged as a better way to prepare the body against sepsis complications.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".