Plane Deformations of an Inhomogeneity–Matrix System Incorporating a Compressible Liquid Inhomogeneity and Complete Gurtin–Murdoch Interface Model
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We consider the plane deformations of an infinite elastic solid containing an arbitrarily shaped compressible liquid inhomogeneity in the presence of uniform remote in-plane loading. The effects of residual interface tension and interface elasticity are incorporated into the model of deformation via the complete Gurtin–Murdoch (G–M) interface model. The corresponding boundary value problem is reformulated and analyzed in the complex plane. A concise analytical solution describing the entire stress field in the surrounding solid is found in the particular case involving a circular inhomogeneity. Numerical examples are presented to illustrate the analytic solution when the uniform remote loading takes the form of a uniaxial compression. It is shown that using the simplified G–M interface model instead of the complete version may lead to significant errors in predicting the external loading-induced stress concentration in gel-like soft solids containing submicro- (or smaller) liquid inhomogeneities.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it