Synergistic interaction between docosahexaenoic acid and diclofenac on inflammation, nociception, and gastric security models in rats
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Preclinical Research & Development The addition of polyunsaturated fatty acids to nonsteroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs can increase their antinociceptive activity and produce a gastroprotective effect. The aim of the present study was to examine the effects of the interaction between docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) and diclofenac on inflammation (fixed ratios 1:1, 1:3, and 3:1), nociception (fixed ratio 1:3), and gastric injury in rats. DHA, diclofenac, or combinations of DHA and diclofenac produced anti‐inflammatory and antinociceptive effects in rat. The administration of diclofenac produced significant gastric damage, but this effect was not observed with either DHA or the DHA–diclofenac combinations. Effective dose (ED 30 ) values were estimated for each individual drug and analyzed isobolographically. The anti‐inflammatory experimental ED 30 values were 6.97 mg/kg (1:1 fixed ratio), 1.1 mg/kg (1:3 fixed ratio), and 11.34 mg/kg (3:1 fixed ratio). These values were significantly lower ( p < .05) than the theoretical ED 30 values: 67.94 mg/kg (1:1), 35.37 mg/kg (1:3), and 100.51 mg/kg (3:1). The antinociceptive experimental value was 1.25 mg/kg (1:3 fixed ratio). This value was lower ( p < .05) than the theoretical ED 30 , which was predicted to be 15.92 mg/kg. These data indicate that the DHA–diclofenac combinations interact at the systemic level, produce minor gastric damage, and potentially have therapeutic advantages for the clinical treatment of inflammatory pain.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it