MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2891263329 · doi:10.23889/ijpds.v3i4.656

Impact of clinical subtypes of preterm birth on child health and development

2018· article· en· W2891263329 on OpenAlexaffabout
Amy Metcalfe, Paul D. Brown, Carly A. McMorris, Kathleen H. Chaput, Maria B. Ospina, Kaylee Ramage, Radha Chari, Doug Wilson

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal for Population Data Science · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPreterm Birth and Chorioamnionitis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of AlbertaUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineGestational ageGestationConfoundingOdds ratioPediatricsPremature birthObstetricsLogistic regressionPregnancyOddsInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

IntroductionPreterm birth (birth <37 weeks of gestation) is common. While the clinical conditions leading to preterm birth are heterogeneous, most studies examining the short- and long-term consequences of preterm birth on child health and development, only consider the gestational age at delivery, and not the underlying mechanism of preterm birth. Objectives and ApproachMaternal hospitalization and perinatal data for deliveries occurring in Alberta, Canada in 2004, 2009, and 2014 were linked to identify underlying mechanisms for delivery (i.e., infection/inflammation (I/I), placental dysfunction (PD), both, or neither). Linked hospitalization, emergency department, and physician claims data were used to assess child health outcomes up to age 10. Chi-square tests were used to assess differences in the absolute rate of each outcome stratified by gestational age at delivery and underlying mechanism for delivery. Logistic regression was used to assess relative differences following adjustment for confounders compared to term infants without exposure to I/I or PD. ResultsA total of 134,424 children were included in the analysis. For preterm births occurring <32 weeks of gestation, no differences were observed in child health outcomes based on the underlying mechanism of preterm birth. However, infants born at 32-33 weeks following PD compared to I/I had significantly higher odds (PD:69.1%, OR=29.7, 95% CI:25.7-34.2 vs. I/I:47.2%, OR=18.7, 95% CI:16.8-20.9) of neonatal morbidity; while those born at 34-36 weeks had increased odds of neonatal morbidity (PD:21.1%, OR=5.1, 95% CI: 4.7-5.5 vs. I/I:16.2%, OR=3.7, 95% CI:3.4-3.9) and developmental disabilities (PD:3.3%, OR=2.2, 95% CI:1.8-2.6 vs. I/I:1.6%, OR=1.7, 95% CI:1.4-2.0). No differences were observed in mortality by sub-type of preterm birth; however, as expected perinatal mortality rates were significantly more common in preterm than term births. Conclusion/ImplicationsBoth the short- and long-term outcomes of preterm birth differ by the underlying mechanism leading to preterm delivery. Having a clearer prognosis for infants born preterm may promote the use of clinical interventions earlier for children at increased risk, leading to improved child health and development.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.155
Threshold uncertainty score0.308

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.000
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.123
GPT teacher head0.489
Teacher spread0.366 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal for Population Data ScienceSame topicPreterm Birth and ChorioamnionitisFrench-language works237,207