MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Impact of exercise on psychological burden in adult survivors of childhood cancer: A report from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study (CCSS).

2018· article· en· W2891333639 on OpenAlexaff
Emily S. Tonorezos, Jennifer S. Ford, Linwei Wang, Kirsten K. Ness, Yutaka Yasui, Wendy M. Leisenring, Charles A. Sklar, Leslie L. Robison, Kevin C. Oeffinger, Paul C. Nathan, Gregory T. Armstrong, Kevin R. Krull, Lee W. Jones

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicChildhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick ChildrenAIDS Vancouver
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAnxietySomatizationDepression (economics)Quality of life (healthcare)PopulationCancerPhysical therapyInternal medicinePsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

10513 Background: Adult survivors of childhood cancer are at risk for adverse psychological outcomes. Whether exercise can attenuate this risk is unknown. Methods: Using a longitudinal design, 6199 CCSS participants (median [range] age 34 years [22-54] and median [range] age at diagnosis 10 years [0-21]) completed a baseline questionnaire assessing vigorous exercise, medical and psychological conditions. Psychological outcomes were evaluated in a subsequent questionnaire a median of 7.8 years later (range 0.1-10). Primary outcome was overall psychological burden, defined as: symptom level above the 90th percentile of population norms on the Brief Symptom Inventory-18 for depression, anxiety, or somatization ; cancer-related pain; cognitive impairment; or poor quality of life. Log-binomial regression estimated associations between exercise [total metabolic equivalent-hrs.wk-1 (MET-hrs.wk-1)] and these outcomes adjusting for cancer diagnosis/treatment, demographics, and baseline medical/psychological illness. Results: The prevalence of overall psychological burden at follow-up was 71.3%. The prevalence of depression was 11.4%, anxiety 7.4%, and somatization 13.9%. Among those not engaged in vigorous exercise, the prevalence of overall psychological burden was 75.9%, compared to 68.6% in those who exercised ≥3 MET-hrs.wk-1 (p < 0.001). Compared to 0 MET-hrs.wk-1 of vigorous exercise, the adjusted prevalence ratio (PR) for overall psychological burden was 0.98 (95% CI, 0.95-1.01) for 3-6 MET-hrs.wk-1, 0.93 (95% CI, 0.90-0.96) for 9-12 MET-hrs.wk-1, and 0.94 (95% CI, 0.90-0.98) for 15-21 MET-hrs.wk-1. Compared to not reporting vigorous exercise, 9 to 12 MET-hrs.wk-1 was associated with an adjusted PR of 0.76 (95% CI, 0.62-0.93; p = 0.004) for depression and 0.79 (95% CI, 0.66-0.94; p = 0.003) for somatization. Vigorous exercise was associated with higher cognitive function in domains of task completion, organization, and working memory (p’s < 0.05) but was not associated with cancer pain or quality of life. Conclusions: Vigorous exercise is associated with lower psychological burden and less cognitive impairment in long-term survivors of childhood cancer.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.039

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.111
GPT teacher head0.513
Teacher spread0.402 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical Oncology→Same topicChildhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life→French-language works237,207→