Analysis of the Views of Preschool Teachers on Their Professional Work
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The general objective of the present study was to assess the views of pre-school teachers on their professional work.Since the research aimed to describe the current status of professional work, it was designed with the survey model.The study group included 105 pre-school teachers determined with the single-stage sampling method. The data werecollected with Views on Professional Work Questionnaire for teachers (MEB, 2006). The data obtained in the studywere analyzed using the SPSS 21.0 software. The Mann-Whitney U-Test and the Independent Samples t-Test wereused to compare the differences between the quantitative data when there are two groups, and one-way ANOVA wasused to compare the group parameters between more than two groups. The study results demonstrated that the viewsof pre-school teachers on professional work were at a good level in terms of both the beginning and the end of theyear professional work and the fulfillment of teachers’ needs by the professional work. However, the views ofpre-school teachers on the beginning and the end of the year professional work and the fulfillment of teachers’ needsby the professional work did not demonstrate a significant difference based on gender, seniority in the teachingprofession, place of employment and participation in activities on vocational studies during the previous three yearsvariables.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".