MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

QUADRA: A phase 2, open-label, single-arm study to evaluate niraparib in patients (pts) with relapsed ovarian cancer (ROC) who have received ≥3 prior chemotherapy regimens.

2018· article· en· W2891362692 on OpenAlexaff
Kathleen N. Moore, Angeles Alvarez Secord, Melissa A. Geller, David S. Miller, Noelle Cloven, Gini F. Fleming, Andrea E. Wahner Hendrickson, Masoud Azodi, Paul DiSilvestro, Amit M. Oza, Mihaela Cristea, Jonathan S. Berek, John K. Chan, Yong Li, Romnee Clark, Ursula A. Matulonis, Bradley J. Monk

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPARP inhibition in cancer therapy
Canadian institutionsPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineInternal medicineClinical endpointBRCA mutationPhases of clinical researchOvarian cancerPopulationOncologyChemotherapyProgressive diseaseRefractory (planetary science)Adverse effectGastroenterologyPlaceboCancerClinical trialPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

5514 Background: PARP inhibitors (PARPi) are approved as active treatment only for pts with BRCA mutations. The PARPi niraparib demonstrated increased PFS vs placebo in the maintenance setting of platinum (plat) responsive ROC. Niraparib was effective regardless of BRCAmut or homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) status, but an increased treatment effect was observed in the HRDpos population. QUADRA (NCT02354586) evaluated niraparib active treatment in ROC pts. Based on the results of NOVA, the primary objective in QUADRA was to determine ORR in plat sensitive, HRDpos patients. Methods: Eligible pts had grade 2 or 3 serous ROC, ≥3 prior lines of chemo and measurable disease. Pts were evaluated for BRCAmut and HRD status (MyChoice HRD Test). HRDpos included germline or tumor BRCA mutation or an HRD score ≥42. Pts received niraparib 300 mg once daily until progression; treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were managed with dose reduction to 200 or 100 mg. The primary endpoint was ORR per RECIST v1.1. Results: 463 pts were treated. Median age was 65 (range: 29-91). 162 pts were plat refractory; 152 plat resistant; 118 plat sensitive; 31 unknown. In HRDpos, plat sensitive pts who had received ≥3 regimens (median: 3 [range: 3-9]), without prior PARPi (N = 51) ORR was 27.5% (95% CI: 15.9%, 41.7%); DCR was 68.6%; DOR was 9.2 mos. Of the 51 pts, ORR was 38.9% (7/18) in BRCAmut and 21.2% in BRCAwt pts (7/33). 260 (56.2%) pts had grade ≥3 treatment-related TEAEs. The most common grade ≥3 TEAEs were thrombocytopenia (27.9%), anemia (24.9%), and neutropenia (12.4%). Grade ≥3 thrombocytopenia was 27.5% at 300 mg, 4.7% at 200 mg, and 2.7% at 100 mg. Hematologic TEAEs were most frequent in the first month and decreased in frequency and severity after dose reduction during months 2-3. Conclusions: Niraparib demonstrated durable anti-cancer activity in this heavily treated, HRDpos ROC population (4th line or greater), including BRCAwt pts. Toxicities, consistent with previous niraparib studies, were manageable with dose reduction and generally resolved within 3 mos. Final data including ORR in the total population (N = 463) and results in other subgroups will be presented. Disclosure Funded by TESARO, Inc. Clinical trial information: NCT02354586.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.218
GPT teacher head0.530
Teacher spread0.312 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations29
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical OncologySame topicPARP inhibition in cancer therapyFrench-language works237,207