MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Impact of intervening in high-risk nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (HRnmCRPC) on metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) disease burden.

2018· article· en· W2891380948 on OpenAlexaff
Eric J. Small, Fred Saad, Ying Zheng, Feng Pan, Maneesha Mehra, Joe Lawson, Boris Hadaschik, Hiroji Uemura, Ji Youl Lee, Paul N. Mainwaring, Matthew R. Smith

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicProstate Cancer Treatment and Research
Canadian institutionsCentre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineProstate cancerHazard ratioCancerOncologyInternal medicineEnzalutamideAndrogen deprivation therapyPlaceboGynecologyAndrogen receptorConfidence intervalPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

e17010 Background: Approved treatments for patients with mCRPC are associated with meaningful improvements in progression-free and overall survival. The burden of mCRPC remains high, however, as it is linked to high mortality and cost. In the randomized placebo-controlled phase 3 SPARTAN trial, apalutamide, an orally administered next-generation androgen receptor inhibitor, demonstrated clinically significant improvement in metastasis-free survival, with a hazard ratio of 0.28 (95% CI, 0.23-0.35) for patients with HRnmCRPC. This study explores the potential epidemiologic impact of apalutamide in HRnmCRPC and mCRPC. Methods: A published US dynamic disease progression model for prostate cancer was updated, incorporating clinical trial data from new mCRPC and HRnmCRPC treatments. The analyses focused on progression of patients from HRnmCRPC to mCRPC with current treatments (Base Case) and upon introduction of apalutamide. Quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were estimated based on EQ-5D utility reported in SPARTAN and the literature. Results: With 50% of incident nmCRPC patients considered high risk, the model estimates 2018 US prevalence of HRnmCRPC at 31,682. Each year, 39% of HRnmCRPC patients progress to mCRPC. Without the introduction of new treatments, the number of new patients progressing from HRnmCRPC to mCRPC between 2018 and 2024 is projected to be 89,015. With the introduction of apalutamide, the cumulative incident of mCRPC cases averted will be 33,827, which represents a 38% reduction. The cumulative deaths averted from 2018 to 2024 will be 92,553, and a total of 88,682 QALYs will be gained during this 7-year period. Conclusions: Using a dynamic disease state model, introducing effective novel treatment in nmCRPC delays or prevents the progression from HRnmCRPC to mCRPC, and leads to considerable reduction in the clinical burden associated with mCRPC.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.031

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.003
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.122
GPT teacher head0.507
Teacher spread0.385 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical Oncology→Same topicProstate Cancer Treatment and Research→French-language works237,207→