Atypical Multiple Site Behavior of Hafnocene Catalysts in Ethylene/1-Hexene Copolymerization Using Trioctylaluminum and Borate
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Solution copolymerizations of ethylene and 1-hexene were performed using the dichloride (HfCl2) and dimethyl (HfMe2) analogues of the bis(n-propylcyclopentadienyl)hafnium precatalyst. Tetrakis(pentafluorophenyl) borate dimethylanilinium salt ([B(C6F5)4]−[Me2NHPh]+) (B) or methylaluminoxane (MAO) was employed as activator, and tri-n-octylaluminum (TOA) was used as scavenger. Crystallization analysis fractionation (CRYSTAF) or crystallization elution fractionation (CEF) was used to measure the chemical composition distributions (CCD). Above a minimum 1-hexene threshold concentration, the CCD profiles of all copolymers were bimodal, and the areas under the peaks depended on the B/HfCl2 and B/Al ratios. Decreasing the TOA concentration reduced the weight fraction of the higher crystallinity copolymer. Copolymerizations using MAO also produced copolymers with bimodal CCDs. Copolymerizations using HfMe2/B without TOA produced copolymers with unimodal CCD. These results suggest that TOA reacts with either the catalyst or the activator, generating a new active site with a lower propensity for incorporating comonomer than the original catalyst system.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".