MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2891425307 · doi:10.1139/cjm-2018-0129

Deletion of <i>oxyR</i> in <i>Legionella pneumophila</i> causes growth defect on agar

2018· article· en· W2891425307 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Nilmini Mendis, Hana Trigui, Mariam Saad, Adrianna R Tsang, Sébastien P. Faucher

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Microbiology · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicLegionella and Acanthamoeba research
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLegionella pneumophilaMicrobiologyBiologyMutantAgarWild typeBacteriaLegionellaGeneBiochemistryGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The intracellular pathogen Legionella pneumophila (Lp) is a strict aerobe, surviving and replicating in environments where it frequently encounters reactive oxygen species (ROS), such as the nutrient-poor water environment and its replicative niche inside host cells. In many proteobacteria, the LysR-type regulator OxyR controls the oxidative stress response; however, the importance of the OxyR homologue in Lp is still unclear. Therefore, we undertook the characterization of phenotypes associated with the deletion of oxyR in Lp. Contrary to the wild type, the oxyR deletion mutant exhibits a severe growth defect on charcoal - yeast extract (CYE) agar lacking α-ketoglutarate supplementation. Growth in AYE broth (CYE without agar and charcoal), in amoeba and in human cultured macrophages, and survival in water is unaffected by the deletion. Supplementing CYE agar with antioxidants that neutralize ROS or introducing the oxyR gene in trans rescues the observed growth defect. Moreover, the mutant grows as well as the wild type on CYE plates made with agarose instead of agar, suggesting that a compound present in the latter is responsible for the growth defect phenotype.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of MicrobiologySame topicLegionella and Acanthamoeba researchFrench-language works237,207