Multiple Histone Methyl-Lysine Readers Ensure Robust Development and Germline Immortality in <i>Caenorhabditis elegans</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract As histone lysine methylation “readers”, chromo domain-containing proteins can provide a link between the chromatin landscape and downstream gene regulation. Saltzman et al. define new roles for two uncharacterized Caenorhabditis elegans chromo domain proteins... Chromatin modifications, including methylation of histone H3 at lysine 27 (H3K27me) by the Polycomb group proteins, play a broadly conserved role in the maintenance of cell fate. Diverse chromatin organization modifier (chromo) domain proteins act as “readers” of histone methylation states. However, understanding the functional relationships among chromo domains and their roles in the inheritance of gene expression patterns remains challenging. Here, we identify two chromo-domain proteins, CEC-1 and CEC-6, as potential readers of H3K27me in Caenorhabditis elegans, where they have divergent expression patterns and contribute to distinct phenotypes. Both cec-1 and cec-6 genetically interact with another chromo-domain gene, cec-3, a reader of H3K9 methylation. Combined loss of cec-1 and cec-3 leads to developmental defects in the adult that result in decreased fitness. Furthermore, loss of cec-6 and cec-3 surprisingly leads to a progressive loss of fertility across generations, a “mortal germline” phenotype. Our results provide evidence of functional compensation between H3K27me and H3K9me heterochromatin pathways, and show that histone methylation readers contribute to both somatic development and transgenerational fitness.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".