Complete dexrazoxane cardioprotection for cardiac function but incomplete female cardioprotection for cardiac structure in doxorubicin-treated osteosarcoma survivors: Hearts too small for the body.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
10519 Background: Dexrazoxane is protective for lower-dose doxorubicin ( < 300 mg/m2) cardiotoxicity in childhood cancer, but the effect of dexrazoxane (DXRZ) administered with higher-dose (HD) doxorubicin (DOXO) is unknown. Methods: We evaluated patients from Children’s Oncology Group trials for localized (P9754) and metastatic (AOST0121) osteosarcoma (OS) who received HD DOXO (375-600 mg/m2) preceded by DXRZ (10:1 ratio), methotrexate, and cisplatin; some also received ifosfamide alone or ifosfamide/etoposide ± trastuzumab. Cardiotoxicity was identified by echocardiography and by serum N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) concentrations. Results: 81 DXRZ -treated OS patients ( age at enrollment = 13.7 years; range 3.8 - 23.7 years) had normal left ventricular (LV) systolic function as measured by LV fractional shortening and no heart failure. Female sex and longer follow-up since DOXO were associated with a significantly smaller LV dimension z-score normalized to BSA (μ = -1.20, 95%CI [-1.70, -0.70]). Similarly, in the one-third of patients treated > 81 days after minimal expected treatment (groups equally partitioned by time), significantly thinner LV posterior wall thickness for BSA (μ = -0.57, [-1.05, -0.09]) was found. Interventricular septal wall thickness (μ = -0.84, [-1.2, -0.48]) and LV mass (μ = -0.73, [-1.06, -0.40]) were significantly smaller for BSA than normal for both sexes. For females, these became significantly more abnormal with increasing length of follow-up. Females also showed progressive increases in NT-proBNP. Conclusions: DXRZ is cardioprotective for HD DOXO in terms of LV function and heart failure. Females had progressive abnormalities of LV structure, leading to smaller hearts for body size. This was associated with increasing cardiac stress, as measured by NT-proBNP. DXRZ protection was incomplete for HD DOXO effects on LV structure, resulting in higher LV stress and risk for late LV dysfunction. DXRZ should continue to be used in this population, including for females who exhibit more cardiotoxicity than males at specific cumulative DOXO doses.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".