MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2891549492 · doi:10.1002/ajmg.a.40482

Warsaw breakage syndrome: Further clinical and genetic delineation

2018· article· en· W2891549492 on OpenAlexaff
Ebba Alkhunaizi, Ranad Shaheen, Sanjay Kumar Bharti, Ann M. Joseph‐George, Karen Chong, Ghada M. H. Abdel‐Salam, Mohammed Al‐Owain, Susan Blasér, Blake C. Papsin, Mohammed T. Butt, Nicole Martin, Ruth Godoy, Robert M. Brosh, Fowzan S. Alkuraya, David Chitayat

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Medical Genetics Part A · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenomics and Rare Diseases
Canadian institutionsToronto Centre for PhenogenomicsHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of TorontoSickKids FoundationMount Sinai Hospital
FundersNational Institutes of Health
KeywordsMicrocephalyBiologyPhenotypeGeneticsHearing lossAlleleSensorineural hearing lossHypoplasiaGeneMedicineAudiologyAnatomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Warsaw breakage syndrome (WBS) is a recently recognized DDX11-related rare cohesinopathy, characterized by severe prenatal and postnatal growth restriction, microcephaly, developmental delay, cochlear anomalies, and sensorineural hearing loss. Only seven cases have been reported in the English literature, and thus the information on the phenotype and genotype of this interesting condition is limited. We provide clinical and molecular information on five additional unrelated patients carrying novel bi-allelic variants in the DDX11 gene, identified via whole exome sequencing. One of the variants was found to be a novel Saudi founder variant. All identified variants were classified as pathogenic or likely pathogenic except for one that was initially classified as a variant of unknown significance (VOUS) (p.Arg378Pro). Functional characterization of this VOUS using heterologous expression of wild type and mutant DDX11 revealed a marked effect on protein stability, thus confirming pathogenicity of this variant. The phenotypic data of the seven WBS reported patients were compared to our patients for further phenotypic delineation. Although all the reported patients had cochlear hypoplasia, one patient also had posterior labyrinthine anomaly. We conclude that while the cardinal clinical features in WBS (microcephaly, growth retardation, and cochlear anomalies) are almost universally present, the breakage phenotype is highly variable and can be absent in some cases. This report further expands the knowledge of the phenotypic and molecular features of WBS.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.839
Threshold uncertainty score0.439

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.310
Teacher spread0.299 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations32
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of Medical Genetics Part ASame topicGenomics and Rare DiseasesFrench-language works237,207