MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A phase I/II study of atezolizumab in pediatric and young adult patients with refractory/relapsed solid tumors (iMATRIX-Atezolizumab).

2017· article· en· W2891568037 on OpenAlexaff
Birgit Geoerger, Erin E. Karski, Michel Zwaan, Michela Casanova, Lynley V. Marshall, Steven G. DuBois, Matthew Kowgier, Michael Tagen, Antonia Kwan, Meghna Das-Thakur, Tanya Trippett

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCAR-T cell therapy research
Canadian institutionsRoche (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAtezolizumabMedicineEpendymomaRefractory (planetary science)Internal medicineSarcomaGastroenterologyOncologyCancerSurgeryPathologyNivolumabImmunotherapy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

10524 Background: Atezolizumab targets programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1), leading to enhanced anticancer T-cell response. The iMATRIX-Atezolizumab study (phase I/II, multicenter, open-label; NCT02541604) assessed the safety, pharmacokinetics (PK) and preliminary activity of atezolizumab in pediatric/young adult patients with refractory/relapsed solid tumors. Methods: Patients aged < 30 years with refractory/relapsed non-central nervous system solid tumors received atezolizumab every 3 weeks until loss of clinical benefit ( < 18 years old, 15mg/kg [maximum dose 1200mg]; ≥18 years old, 1200mg). Safety/PK were assessed across tumor types and initial response was assessed by tumor-type cohorts after approximately 10 patients in each cohort had been treated. Results: As of July 19 2016, 74 patients (median age 14 years; range 2–29) were enrolled: osteosarcoma, n = 12; Ewing sarcoma, n = 11; neuroblastoma, n = 11; rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS), n = 10; non-RMS soft tissue sarcoma, n = 10; Wilms tumor, n = 6; Hodgkin lymphoma (HL), n = 5; non-HL, n = 1; other tumor types, n = 8. PK data (n = 48) were similar to that in adults (geometric mean Cmin, µg/mL [cycle 2, day 1, pre-dose]: 53.6 [2– < 6 years old]; 54.1 [6– < 12 years old]; 62.0 [12– < 18 years old]; 68.0 [adult]). Most tumors, except HL, had < 1% (score 0) tumor cell [TC]/tumor-infiltrating immune cell (IC) PD-L1 expression with overall TC/IC-positive expression rates (≥1%, score 1–3) of 7% and 10%, respectively. All available HL samples had ≥5% (score 2–3) TC/IC PD-L1 expression. 67/71 patients who received atezolizumab (median cycles 2; range 1–10) had ≥1 adverse event (AE; mainly immune-related grade 1–2); 17 patients (24%) had treatment-related grade 3–4 AEs. One AE (grade 3 transaminase increase) led to study drug discontinuation. Common AEs were pyrexia (37%), fatigue (34%) and constipation (32%). 2/5 patients with HL had a partial response (PR); the only patient with atypical rhabdoid tumor (RT) had an unconfirmed PR. Conclusions: The PK and safety profile of atezolizumab in pediatric and young adult patients is similar to that in adults. Preliminary antitumor activity was seen in HL and RT; new cohorts are planned in RT and atypical teratoid RT. Clinical trial information: NCT02541604.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.079
GPT teacher head0.476
Teacher spread0.397 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical OncologySame topicCAR-T cell therapy researchFrench-language works237,207