An I<sup>2</sup>O<sup>1</sup> Barium Framework Derived from an In‐Situ Metal‐Assisted Ligand Transformation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The use of 4,4′‐[oxalylbis(azanediyl)]bis(2‐hydroxybenzoic acid) (H 6 L 1 ) in the Ba 2+ chemistry has afforded a 3D polymer, namely [Ba(H 2 L 2 )(H 2 O)] n ( 1 ), which is based on H 2 L 2 2– anions derived by the in‐situ metal‐assisted transformation of H 6 L 1 . The neutral H 4 L 2 [4‐(carboxyformamido)‐2‐hydroxybenzoic acid] ligand was isolated from 1 and characterized by spectroscopic methods. Polymer 1 is based on edge and face‐sharing BaO 10 polyhedra which create an inorganic layer pillared to the third dimension by the organic ligands and has been classified as an I 2 O 1 framework. The topological analysis of 1 provided an opportunity to introduce a method for the deconstruction of I 2 O 1 frameworks by adopting principles applied in the deconstruction of Metal‐Organic‐Frameworks (MOFs) with rod Secondary Building Units (SBUs). A detailed discussion and insights for the proper use of the I m O n notation which finds application in describing the dimensionality in MOFs, is also provided.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".