MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Risk-stratified multidisciplinary ambulatory management of malignant bowel obstruction (MAMBO) program for women with advanced gynecological cancer.

2017· article· en· W2891656079 on OpenAlexaff
Yeh Chen Lee, Stéphanie Lheureux, Nazlin Jivraj, Catherine O′Brien, Stéphane Laframboise, Lisa Tinker, Toral Patel, Terri Stuart-McEwan, Pamela Savage, Alexandra Easson, Jennifer Croke, Jenny Lau, Eran Shlomovitz, Tanya Chawla, Johane P. Allard, Sarah Buchanan, Pamela Ng, Katherine Karakasis, Amit M. Oza

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicIntestinal and Peritoneal Adhesions
Canadian institutionsMount Sinai HospitalToronto General HospitalUniversity Health NetworkPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAmbulatoryColorectal cancerPopulationGynecologic cancerCancerProspective cohort studyBowel managementIntensive care medicineSurgeryInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

e18024 Background: Malignant bowel obstruction (MBO) in gynecologic oncology patients is associated with poor prognosis, debilitating symptoms and compromises quality of life. Management of MBO poses a clinical challenge with prolonged hospitalization. Evidence based guidelines for surgical intervention, use of chemotherapy, total parenteral nutrition or best supportive care in this patient population is lacking. Surgical correction may improve survival in selected patients. Retrospective analysis to assess impact of MBO show variable range of MBO-related admissions up to 60 days, and is associated with significant morbidity. Methods: A risk stratified MAMBO program for gynecologic patients has been implemented at Princess Margaret Cancer Centre to define a systematic approach for MBO management and build multidisciplinary consensus for personalized treatment of our patients. The program is novel and includes a nurse-led ambulatory management algorithm with an eHealth application designed to monitor bowel symptoms. A symptom-driven classification system has been devised to objectively define risk using a MBO management algorithm. Complex MBO cases are discussed in designated MBO rounds for consensus treatment recommendation. All patients with MBO are enrolled into a prospective database. Patients undergoing surgical procedures for MBO are consented for opportunistic tissue collection for translational research. MBO patient education materials have been developed to improve awareness and encourage proactive bowel symptom management. Results: Seventy nine patients have been followed through this risk stratified MAMBO program for ambulatory care over 6 months. The MBO program integrates diet, laxatives/stool softeners and drug therapy. Designated MBO rounds are now established for complex case discussion. A prospective MBO database will evaluate treatment and patient-reported outcomes. Conclusions: Risk stratified model of care for multidisciplinary MBO program facilitates decision-making between disciplines and optimize patient care in a vulnerable population with support for ambulatory care.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.794
Threshold uncertainty score0.369

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.105
GPT teacher head0.481
Teacher spread0.376 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical OncologySame topicIntestinal and Peritoneal AdhesionsFrench-language works237,207